The Hunt For Red Taxation
by: R.J. Moeller
Alec Baldwin is one of the most talented actors alive today. I mean it. I am a huge fan. He’s given masterful performances in both action and drama films, and now stars alongside Saturday Night Live alums Tina Fey and Tracy Morgan in the funniest show on television: NBC’s 30 Rock.
But who knew this same multi-talented, uber-liberal guy, the one who famously threatened to move out of the country in 2004 should conservative George W. Bush be re-elected president, was an Adam Smith supply-side economist to-boot?
I guess to be fair to
You see, for many years the state government in
The government in New York, participating in its constitutionally-appointed duty to help facilitate commerce in and among the states, has in the past made the prospect of filming shows and movies in their state more attractive by offering big companies the tradeoff of lower taxes in return for their business. These production companies set up offices in
But just this month, the Wall Street Journal reports, Governor David Patterson, a Democrat, has made a threat of his own, and it is one that appears to be infinitely more serious and important than
In lieu of the state’s gargantuan $7 billion budget deficit, one caused by over-spending and unprecedented levels of corruption, mismanagement, and incompetence within the government, Patterson says that the tax breaks for production companies might soon be one of those “incentives” that will be rescinded.
To this Alec Baldwin rightly, if not ironically, says: Phooey!
“I’m telling you right now,” Mr. Baldwin declared, “if these tax breaks are not re-instated in to the budget, film production in this town [
Bingo, Alec. You not only just made the case for why free markets cannot work in an over-taxed, over-regulated environment, you courageously overcame the typical liberal urge to deny common sense when economics is involved.
This type of person doesn't mean to be misinformed, and their intentions I'm sure are almost always pure. But there is a huge disconnect between what most liberals want liberalism to be and what actually happens when their government taxes and spends like there is no tomorrow.
The realities of life, including complex economies and delicate relations with hostile foreign nations, do not easily lend themselves to the hypothetical ramblings of, for example, someone who gets paid millions of dollars to pretend for a living, like Mr. Baldwin.
For many in
But now the free-range chickens have come home to organically roost.
Despite their voting and legislative practices, liberals consistently show that they know raising taxes on goods or services is a way to discourage that good or service. Take, for example, tobacco. Few products are more heavily scrutinized and taxed than cigarettes. Commercial campaigns led predominantly by liberal groups certainly help to spread the word about the risks involved with smoking. Yet the real way in which most Democrats in most states attack “Big Tobacco” is through higher levels of taxation. When they don’t want something to enjoy success, they tax it.
And here again, in the example of Governor Patterson’s attempt to repeal tax credits for production companies filming in his state, we see through the public statements of a life-long liberal like Alex Baldwin that even he recognizes the devastating effect higher taxes will have on an industry and thousands of jobs. This isn’t rocket science, people. Mr. Baldwin understands it.
The tough truth for prominent liberals to swallow is that free market conservatives and libertarians are not all conniving, selfish money-changers who want decreased levels of taxation and government intervention for their own personal gain. The economy is a complicated, interconnected web of trade and commerce that requires some basic things like voluntary participation (i.e. deciding to work in the movie industry instead of being a banker or teacher) and a largely hands-off relationship with the government (i.e. the opposite of Governor Patterson arbitrarily deciding to punish the movie industry because of his own government’s ineptness).
Sadly, foundational principles of the American economic system, things that seem self-evident to so many of us, are rejected by many who consider themselves Left-of-Center simply because it is free market conservatives or libertarians promoting them these days.
But give even the most ardent Leftist a healthy dose of economic reality, let taxation and over-regulation rob them of the Golden Goose that lays the golden eggs, and you’ll hear impassioned and eloquent defenses of the free market system that would make even old Milton Friedman smile from grave.
I don’t dislike Alec Baldwin. I mean him no disrespect when I call him a liberal. He is entitled to his opinions and positions just as much as anyone else. And, most importantly,
But why does he then vote for, publicly endorse, and financially support the very same party and ideology that proudly promises to continue such economically-crippling, short-sighted policies should they gain more power? Why do so many liberals become enraged when companies move overseas or out of state due to high taxes, but then cheer when their candidates promise to raise taxes and increase regulation on those same companies?
I would simply ask those of you reading this to take time from your busy schedules and learn more about the levels and types of taxation your government levies against you. Stay on top of the spending habits of your mayor, your governor, and certainly your president. All of this information is a matter of public record. Too many Republicans failed to do this while their party was in power six of the last eight years, and that failure to curtail spending (and the growth of the federal government) has helped land us in the tight spot we find ourselves in today.
Support lower levels of taxation and a decrease in government spending and you will see the economy begin to correct itself. This shouldn’t be a Right or Left issue. It’s common sense; something that has served
Spain’s Courts Want Say in USA

Ever heard of "universal jurisdiction"? No? Good. You're normal, and likely not from Spain.
European courts are increasingly seeking to try American citizens for alleged "war crimes" relating to the Bush's administration's adjudication of the War on Terror. Many liberal judges in this country like the idea of international law having bearing on what we do here in our legal system. It is insane and ludicrous.
Please read the full text of this article by Andrew McCarthy from National Review for a full re-cap of what's going on.
The New York Times reports that a Spanish court is considering filing human-rights charges, and issuing arrest warrants, against former attorney general Alberto Gonzales and five other Bush administration officials. The putative defendants did not carry out a single belligerent act, conduct a single interrogation, or direct the operation of any military or intelligence agents actually engaged in hostilities.What these former White House, Justice Department, and Pentagon attorneys did do was to wrestle with complex, largely unsettled questions about the parameters of American law. Unlike their demagogic critics, they were engaged in a serious attempt to set the margins of permissible coercion, under wartime circumstances, against detainees who flout the laws of war, who are not covered by the Geneva Conventions’ prisoner-of-war provisions, who are schooled in counter-interrogation techniques, who had just murdered nearly 3,000 Americans in a sneak attack, and who were promising more of the same.
Hitchens Goes to Lebanon

Christopher Hitchens is a world-renowned writer, journalist, and atheist. While I disagree with much of his worldview, the dude can write...and write well. His column this week is about a recent trip he made to Beirut, Lebanon and the hands-on opportunity he had to witness two very different Lebanon's that exist today. A fascinating read!
An excerpt:
Lebanon is the most plural society in the region, and the “March 14” coalition, the group of parties that leads the current government, essentially represents the Sunnis, the Christians, the Druze (a tribe and creed unique to the region), and the Left. Hezbollah has a partial stranglehold on the Shiite community but by no means a monopoly, and one of the speakers at the rally was a Shiite member of parliament, Bassem Sabaa, who argued very strongly that Arab grievances against Israel should not excuse Arab-on-Arab oppression. Almost nobody displayed any religious emblem, and even the few who did were usually careful to put it next to the ubiquitous cedar-symbol flag of Lebanon itself. Women with head covering were few; women with face covering were nowhere to be seen. Designer jeans were the predominant fashion theme. Eclectic musical choices came over the loudspeakers. The average age was low. Nobody had been bused in, at least not by the state. Nobody had been told to leave work and demonstrate his or her loyalty. You get my drift.This is the way that Lebanon could be: a microcosm of the Middle East where ethnic and confessional differences are resolved by Federalism and by elections. But there is a dark, supervising power that keeps the process under surveillance, and then alters the odds by selecting some actors for abrupt removal.
Obamonomics

Spend. Tax. Over-regulate. Sounds like a winning combination to me, Mr. President. For such a supposedly intelligent, cerebral dude, Barack Obama apparently knows nothing about economics.
But he is willing to pretend he does and gamble with the economic future of this nation by implementing unprecedented levels of spending, debt, and federal government control over every aspect of our lives.
Mark Steyn has more here.
In their first two months, Obama and Geithner have done nothing but vaporize your wealth, and your children's future. What began as an economic crisis is now principally a political usurpation. And, to return to the president's "false choice," that "chaotic and unforgiving capitalism" is exactly what we need right now. It's the quickest, cheapest, fairest, most efficient route to economic stabilization and renewal. A regimented and eternally forgiving global command economy with no moral hazard will destroy us all.
Chickens Come Home to Roost for Ward

Remember Ward Churchill? No? Probably a good thing. He was the "Ethnic Studies" professor from University of Colorado that wrote a highly controversial (and disgusting) essay about 9/11 in which he compared the American victims of that fateful day to Nazi mass-murderer Adolf Eichmann.
Well the University did not take kindly to the negative publicity that surrounded Churchill and after some investigative reporting by local reporters, it was discovered that Old Ward also had lied about his academic credentials, his ethnicity, and was guilty of plagiarism to-boot. So he was fired and of course brought a wrongful-termination lawsuit against the university.
Here is where the Wall Street Journal's Katherine Mangu-Ward picks up the story in today's edition. A very interesting tale indeed.
Democrats get more money from Wall Street
If you're like me, you've likely had just about enough of the "Wall Street vs. Main
Street" populist garbage that has been regurgitated since last year's election cycle. Ann Coulter does a wonderful job in her latest column of showing how it is actually the Left, not the evil Republicans, that is most comfortably linked with the rich CEO's that everyone is so mad at.
"How did Republicans get saddled with Wall Street? Obama just got the biggest campaign haul from Wall Street in world history, and Republicans still can't shake the public perception that they are tied at the hip to Wall Street bankers who hate them.
It's as if National Rifle Association members conspired with Republicans to bankrupt the country and everyone blamed the Democrats for being shills of the NRA."
Happy Birthday to Us
Well, I've not died since my last birthday, so that's worth celebrating. I'm just glad I get to share a day of birth with these "tremendous people."
-Elton John (gay guy who at one time wrote/sang creative songs)
-Sheryl Swoopes (chick who was good at basketball)
-Sarah Jessica Parker (bad actress from the trashiest show)
-Aretha Franklin (former good and healthy singer)
-Howard Cosell (former ABC Sports Broadcaster)
-John Smoltz (MLB pitcher with great beard)

But the one I am the happiest about is....my girl, Danica Patrick, the hottest race car driver since ever.
Happy Birthday to Us, Danica!!!
See ya in a year.
Sex and Food

Did I get your attention? Good. This latest column from Christian conservative commentator and author Chuck Colson is actually about both of these things. Mr. Colson believes that our society has incorrectly made what we eat more important than our sexual behavior.
Hating on AIG

Mark Steyn weighs in with his take on the Obama administration's "handling" of the economic crisis in general, and the AIG "scandal" in particular. He's very good!
"The first two months of the Age of the Hopeychange have been an eye-opener. I expected it to be ideologically distasteful to me, but I didn't expect it to be so inept. Not because I had any expectations of President Obama's executive skills. But I assumed he'd have folks around him who could take care of details like governing, while he pranced around as the smiley-face hopeychange frontman. But the bench is still empty save for a handful of mediocrities. And the disconnect between the smoothly scripted mush and what's actually happening makes the telepromptered cool look even more ridiculous."







