A Voice in the Wilderness In Defense of "Mere Conservatism"

6Dec/09Off

Copenhagen is a joke

polar-bear1

You can't make this stuff up.  From the Telegraph in London:

On a normal day, Majken Friss Jorgensen, managing director of Copenhagen's biggest limousine company, says her firm has twelve vehicles on the road. During the "summit to save the world", which opens here tomorrow, she will have 200.

"We thought they were not going to have many cars, due to it being a climate convention," she says. "But it seems that somebody last week looked at the weather report."

Ms Jorgensen reckons that between her and her rivals the total number of limos in Copenhagen next week has already broken the 1,200 barrier. The French alone rang up on Thursday and ordered another 42. "We haven't got enough limos in the country to fulfil the demand," she says. "We're having to drive them in hundreds of miles from Germany and Sweden."

And the total number of electric cars or hybrids among that number? "Five," says Ms Jorgensen. "The government has some alternative fuel cars but the rest will be petrol or diesel. We don't have any hybrids in Denmark, unfortunately, due to the extreme taxes on those cars. It makes no sense at all, but it's very Danish."

Oh, and it gets even better!  Fox News reports:Say-No-Christmas_Tree1

Participants at Copenhagen's global climate summit will be meeting during the holiday season, but they will not be surrounded by festive Christmas decor, according to Denmark's Foreign Ministry.

Since Christmas is a religious holiday, it has no place at a United Nations event, said officials planning the event.

A sponsor providing fir trees for the conference's Christmas trees learned this the hard way when it was turned away by planners of the international event, the Copenhagen Post reported.

Tons of carbon, no Christmas trees, and Al Gore will be there?  Any takers?

As The Heritage Foundation confirms, the global warming summit in Copenhagen is pathetic and potentially dangerous to U.S. sovereignty.

Compliance with such a treaty would require massive changes to the U.S. economy, and U.N. bodies would decide many of the details of those changes.

Is that the same U.N. that has no room for "religious" things?  I wonder what they would say to the "endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights" concept our nation was founded upon?

There are conservatives out there interested in being good stewards of our world without worshiping it, or destroying the world's economy to "fix" problems in that world that aren't even confirmed to exist.

Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Gross. Childish. Simplistic.

    Of course we have to expend energy to effectively deal with global climate change. Get over your smug self. You’re like a toddler who wanders into the operating room and screams about all the blood.

    Only you’re not a toddler, it’s just an elaborate cynical act. For your own selfish purposes you MUST pick apart every move of the “left.” Were it politically expedient, you would instantaneously reverse course and argue the other side.

    We’re all human, trapped on a celestial body that is about to change the rules. We can either adapt or die.

    The clip from Newt is so perfect an example from the head-in-the-sand set. “Nothing is happening, but if it were we have already done what’s needed.”

  2. Selfish purposes? From reading RJ columns I have gathered that he is in his mid 20’s, attends graduate school, and loves his dog Rudy. What selfish purposes could he have in passing along information that exposes this Climate Summit for the unprecedented scam that it is?

    You obviously have not read much of anything that RJ has written himself. Might I recommend any of the three Mere Conservatism pieces that he has written in the last month or so. Drink those in before you continue sipping on your bitter kool-aid.

    Also, you obviously have read or heard NOTHING that Newt has been saying for years now about climate issues. He is actually one of the only conservative voices who has been open and honest about the fact that we need to be effective stewards of the planet, but make the case for free market solutions to problems that (shockingly) the Left wants the UN to run.

    Nice try though. You’re dealing with a smart blogger and smart readers of that blog here. None of the drivel from Newsvine or Huffington Post is going to work in shaming or scaring us here AVITW.

    Any additional thoughts, RJ?

Trackbacks are disabled.

RJ's Social Network

Read RJ’s Columns/Blogs

What is “Mere Conservatism”?

The basic ideas, ideals, and values that generally define and characterize the central tenets of what today might be termed "modern conservative thought."

We believe that a proper understanding of history, economics, and theology leads to certain conclusions. Many of these are the same conclusions our Founding Fathers arrived at in constructing a "more perfect union."

All ideas and opinions are welcome; not all are correct.

Mere Conservatism Links:
 Econ Part I  |  Econ Part II
Intro  |  Theology  |  History

Video of RJ

RJ Speaking at Acton 2010

Rudy the Dog barks at "change"

Books You Need to Read

Wall Street Journal

Blogroll

Columnists You Need to Read

Music/Entertainment

News/Politics

Thinktanks

Archives

Categories

Historical Blogs

December 2009
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Meta

wordpress blog stats