Shutter Island: Hitchcock-inspired, Moeller-approved
by: R.J. Moeller
My favorite director is Alfred Hitchcock. No one told a story on the silver screen quite like "old Hitch." I especially love Vertigo, North By Northwest, and Notorious. Hitchcock mastered the psychological thriller, loved setting his stories amidst grandiose backdrops and landscapes, always paid great attention to detail, and usually crafted tales about characters who get caught up in things beyond their control.
Martin Scorsese is a legendary director in his own right, and although I am not very fond of his obsession with making ultra-violent films, his latest effort Shutter Island, is an effective homage to the greatness of Hitchcock.
As your eyes could tell you from the trailer, Leonardo DiCaprio stars in Shutter Island and does a fantastic job.
It's 1954 (the year Hitch's classic Rear Window was released), and U.S. Marshall Teddy Daniels (Leo) has been called to investigate the disappearance of an inmate at an island mental hospital for the criminally insane called Ashecliff off the coast of Massachusetts. Teddy's got his new partner Chuck (Mark Ruffalo) along for the investigation, but upon arrival, it becomes apparent to the characters (and audience) that something is not quite right on Shutter Island.
The prison guards are abnormally fidgety, the Marshals are both asked to turn over their firearms (something no federal agent typically has to do), and there is absolutely no trace of the woman who allegedly escaped. The man running things on Shutter Island is Dr. John Cawley, played exquisitely by Academy Award winner Ben Kingsley, who seems to be thoroughly disinterested in actually helping Teddy and Chuck piece the clues together.
Due to forces beyond their control (a hurricane-like storm that hits the island), the two detectives are stranded overnight and we begin to learn more about Teddy's back-story and what really brought him to the island.
Before becoming a Marshal, Teddy was a soldier in WWII and was personally there for the liberation of the concentration camp at Dachau. He is plagued by the senseless death and destruction he witnessed in Europe. To compound his own emotional health issues, Teddy is a grieving widower. His wife, he claims, was killed in a fire that ravaged the apartment building the two of them had lived in back in Boston.
We learn Teddy requested the assignment to Shutter Island because he believes two key things: First, that the man who started the fire that killed his wife is imprisoned somewhere on the island. And second, that Nazi-like medical and psychological tests are being conducted on the criminally insane housed there. He wants to both confront the killer of his beloved deceased, and gather evidence against the doctors he believes are torturing the patients.
Twists and turns in the story abound from there.
I don't want to give away much more about the plot of Shutter Island. It's a compelling script with superb acting performances turned in by almost every major and minor character. The music was disturbing and perfectly set the mood for the entire film (another Hitchcock special). The psychological twists and turns absolutely keep you on your toes, and as soon as the credits role you will likely feel compelled to start your own group therapy session in hopes of figuring out what exactly just happened over the previous two hours and seventeen minutes.
Shutter Island is rated R for language and intense scenes of death (mostly from shots of concentration camp victims). Do not take your grandma to this movie.
While not an "instant classic" or "must see", if you like great acting, Hitchcock-like storytelling and maintaining an uneasy feeling in the pit of your stomach for more than two hours, go see Shutter Island (and let me know what you thought of it if you already have).




March 8th, 2010 - 21:17
It’s a wonderful movie! I too enjoyed it, and although I’m not as avid a Hitchcock fan as you, after reading your review I did recall some Vertigo-like elements in the film.
Leo is one of the most under-rated actors of the last 20 years.
March 8th, 2010 - 21:35
I am now officially intrigued to see this flick. If you had to pick one, RJM, what would you say is your favorite Hitchcock film, and what is your favorite Scorsese film?
Mine are Rear Window and Taxi Driver.
March 8th, 2010 - 21:44
Frank-
Hitchcock = North By Northwest
Scorsese = Goodfellas
Both directors are fantastic, although, as I said in my review, Scorsese takes things too far often in terms of violence, language, and sensuality. But you can’t deny that Gangs of New York, Casino, The Departed, etc. are tremendously well-made movies. I prefer directors (and films) that make you think, play with your emotions, but don’t have to sink into the gutter for the sake of “art.”
Thanks for reading and commenting.
March 9th, 2010 - 18:11
Dug the movie. Big DiCaprio fan myself. Not on my “A” list, especially when I pitched it as another DiCaprio-Scorcese phenomenon to others. I knew the ending before they even got a chance and found it a bit cliche. I was able to ride the twists and turns, but knew many would think it confusing and aggravating than exciting. Once again, I liked the movie, but this one I should have skipped seeing in the expensive theatre and would have rather waited a bit for the hype [self-induced] to have died down. Great review!
March 10th, 2010 - 22:31
Extremely cliched. Painfully predictable. Some false moments. But overall, I really enjoyed it. I figured out the twist from the trailer, but the filmmaking is otherwise really solid. I’d give it a good B-
March 12th, 2010 - 02:42
Good review. Hard to do it without spoilers. For all the people that consider it cliche and predictable, good job, you figured out the basic twist. The movie is not at all about the basic twist, but has to be seen several times to realize how deep the level of details and symbolism is in the movie. LEt me help you : please regroup and find a shared logic to every scene with fire relation. OK. Now regroup all related to water ! Being sick with water at the beginning of the movie, the way the island “zoom” instead of approaching it, they way his partner has difficulty to get out the gun out of its belt, etc, …. Just watch the movie another time with the twist in your mind ! and think again of the last sentence of the last scene.
March 13th, 2010 - 09:46
Predictable .. totally. Angel Heart was a better film with a similar plot line .. Gothika a better film as well I was completely let down.
I fell for the people reviewing the film .. now I wonder if those doing the reviews have actually watched a movie that didn’t SPOON FEED THEM WITH OBVIOUS clues that they are still do dimwitted to catch .. the TRAILER gave enough information to figure this film out… I want to see these reviewers write a review of a film where you actually end up thinking after it.
March 15th, 2010 - 18:55
Massallian I totally get what you’re saying, but on a base level, cliche is cliche. I loved the symbolism, loved the hints and cues, but knowing the ending at the beginning still kills it a little. I dug it, but how many twists can you put on the same idea. I don’t deny the masterpiece and how powerfully done it was, but when I see Scorcese-DiCaprio, I’d better see innovation.