Take My Eyes, But Not “The Food Pyramid”
I am a product of the Illinois public school system (K-12th) in the 1990's and therefore know all-too-well about the illustrious "Food Pyramid" some feminist nutritionist in a pant-suit and clunky jewelry (think: Barbara Streisand in Prince of Tides) conjured up to justify her graduate degree and subjected the rest of us to. I was reminded about the Food Pyramid every year of my life until the age of 18, and for all of that incessant intellectual drilling...I cannot remember where a single food-group goes on that stupid thing. I assume the very top must be "sugars and sweets," but even that is a guess.

The thing was meaningless. And just to prove how utterly inconsequential it is, and again to justify someone's graduate (and probably PhD) studies, the Obama administration has announced a revamped and reformatted version of the Pyramid:
The Obama Administration is getting ready to ditch the Food Pyramid, a symbol of healthy eating for the last two decades.
In its place, officials are "dishing up" a simple, plate-shaped symbol, sliced into wedges for basic food groups and half-filled with fruits and vegetables.
Beside the plate is a smaller circle for dairy, suggesting a glass of low-fat milk or perhaps a yogurt cup.
The revised pyramid is part of the administration's crusade against obesity, led by first lady Michelle Obama.
And the award for the most overtly meaningless gesture in recorded political history goes to...
I get that this story isn't the biggest deal in the world. (Mostly because of how stupid it all is.) But the very notion that bureaucrats in Washington are sitting around concocting new strategies to teach us knuckle-dragging morons how to eat and feed our kids is so aggravating,
Just go away, Michelle Obama and your Food Police minions. Encourage parents to invest in their kids' lives more and make healthier choices.
Other than that, get out of my face. Please.
Two Cringe-Worthy Moments in (Recent) Presidential History
By now, many of you have already seen this footage from President Obama's trip to Great Britain:
But do you remember this cringe-inducing moment from W's presidency? 'Cause I sure do.
I felt like posting these videos mostly because they are funny. But it's also important to remember that no matter who you are, no matter how many people call you "the smartest guy in the room," embarrassment finds us all. Both sides of the political aisle like to put their own leaders and figureheads on pedestals. Moments like these remind us how silly we really all are and what a dog-and-pony-show politics really is.
A significant question I have for anyone who asks me to lend power to them is this: do they have the ability to laugh at themselves?
Sowell: Americans are “slaves to words”
Few people can dissect the passing cultural, political and economic scene quite like Dr. Thomas Sowell.

I'd get sick of citing his work if he ever got sick of penning the most lucid, discerning columns in America. His effort this week focuses on the problem most Americans have when it comes to being able to look past the lofty (but utterly empty) rhetoric of politicians and pundits.
We could definitely use another Abraham Lincoln to emancipate us all from being slaves to words. In the midst of a historic financial crisis of unprecedented government spending, and a national debt that outstrips even the debt accumulated by the reckless government spending of previous administration, we are still enthralled by words and ignoring realities.
President Barack Obama's constant talk about "millionaires and billionaires" needing to pay higher taxes would be a bad joke, if the consequences were not so serious. Even if the income tax rate were raised to 100 percent on millionaires and billionaires, it would still not cover the trillions of dollars the government is spending.
More fundamentally, tax rates-- whatever they are-- are just words on paper. Only the hard cash that comes in can cover government spending. History has shown repeatedly, under administrations of both political parties, that there is no automatic correlation between tax rates and tax revenues.
Dr. Sowell continues:
When the tax rate on the highest incomes was 73 percent in 1921, that brought in less tax revenue than after the tax rate was cut to 24 percent in 1925. Why? Because high tax rates that people don't actually pay do not bring in as much hard cash as lower tax rates that they do pay. That's not rocket science.
Then and now, people with the highest incomes have had the greatest flexibility as to where they will put their money. Buying tax-exempt bonds is just one of the many ways that "millionaires and billionaires" avoid paying hard cash to the government, no matter how high the tax rates go.
Most working people don't have the same options. Their taxes have been taken out of their paychecks before they get them.
Rich people need an incentive to put their money back into the economy. At the heart of the Left's weak-spot on this issue is the categorically false assumption that wealthy people owe it to the rest of us to use their capital for society's benefit. They don't have to do anything with it. They can bury it in the back yard, stash it in their freezer, or, if we play our legislative cards right, they can be presented with an incentive to re-invest their dough back into the economy. The Left fails to grasp this, and when they are control the purse strings and tax rates of the nation, we all suffer for it.
Back in the 1920s, Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon pointed out that people with high incomes were simply not paying the high tax rates that existed on paper, because they were putting their money into tax shelters.
After the tax rates were cut, as Mellon advocated, investments flowed back into the private economy, producing higher output, rising incomes, more tax revenue and more jobs. The annual unemployment rate in the next four years never exceeded 4.2 percent, and in one year was as low as 1.8 percent.
Despite political demagoguery about "tax cuts for the rich," in human terms the rich have less at stake than working people. Precisely because the rich have so many ways of avoiding taxes, a high tax rate is likely to do them far less harm than it does to the economy, on which millions of people depend for jobs.
If Americans began to refuse to envy those with more and refused to cease helping (and giving to) those with less, our financial woes and all of the sickening class warfare would end. To afford and (somewhat) sustain the collectivist dreams of progressive liberals you need Christian birthrates, a Protestant work ethic, and free market enterprise.
But what if our "collective" goal became once more to promote liberty, an entrepreneurial spirit, personal responsibility, and civic duty instead? We wouldn't need to over-tax any group of people and progressive liberalism would go gently into that good night it belongs.
O’Reilly vs. Stewart: “Common” ground
President Obama and his wife recently invited controversial rap artist Common to a poetry-reading session at The White House. People (especially cops) became upset about this invite because Common has publicly supported cop killers in his music, poetry, etc.
Bill O'Reilly voiced his disdain for the White House's decision last week and Jon Stewart over at The Daily Show mocked Bill and the folks at Fox News for being so un-hip as to criticize President Obama and Common. O'Reilly offered to debate Stewart on The Factor, and this epic confrontation took place last night.
Interesting discussion. I give "props" (that's also a "rap phrase", Jon) to both men for airing their grievances face-to-face. We need more of that in this country.
We'll be talking more about this issue on this week's podcast (which we're recording tonight and should be ready Thursday).
Greece: The Logical Result of Socialism, Secularism
"When people don't believe in God, they don't begin to believe in nothing: they begin to believe in anything." -GK Chesterton
"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -Dennis Prager
The nation of Greece has issues. It is a secular society. It has a socialist form of government. It is broke. It has one of the lowest birthrates in the Western world. And now, as a result of all these factors (which are the result of their own decisions over the past 50 years), their nation is falling apart in front of our very eyes.
From The Wall Street Journal today:
"A largely peaceful protest Wednesday by tens of thousands of Greeks against new government austerity measures was marred by violence in central Athens late in the day, when hundreds of youths wearing ski masks hurled water bottles, firecrackers and other objects at police who responded with tear gas and pepper spray...Throughout the day, public services across Greece ground to a halt as civil servants, teachers and hospital staff walked off the job, in one of the biggest demonstrations in months. Central and local government offices were closed, hospitals and ambulance services were operating on skeleton staffs, and schools and universities were shut for the day.
Transport services also were disrupted, with ferry and rail services suspended after dockworkers joined the strike. Public transport around the capital, Athens, operated on a reduced schedule, and flight operations were hit by a four-hour walkout by air-traffic controllers. Journalists also joined in the strike, leading to a blackout of all radio and television news programs."
When enough of a society is employed by the federal government, that society can shut down anytime the union bosses that control those government workers decide they don't like the government's policies.
The story continues:
The strike, the second to be called this year by the country's two main umbrella unions, comes just days before the government is due to present Parliament with €26 billion ($37.4 billion) in further spending cuts and tax increases to slash the budget deficit over the next five years.
"These neoliberal and barbarous policies, which are driving workers and society into poverty for the benefit of creditors and bankers, are taking us back to the last century," said public sector umbrella union Adedy in a statement. "They must not pass!"
Tell me what recent events in the mid-western United States sound eerily familiar to these in Greece? Tell me if there is any difference between the nonsense we hear from union chiefs here in America and the nonsense uttered by these fools in Greece?
Probably the most disturbing and illuminating quote from this WSJ article comes from a candid dental technician:
Vassilis Theodorakopoulos, a 53-year old dental technician who works for the country's main public health-care fund, said he was protesting a 20% cut in his salary, as well as a plan to expand the working week for public servants to 40 hours—in line with the private sector—from 37.5 currently.
"Personally, I don't think there should be a difference between the public and private sector," he said. "What we are fighting for is a reduction in private-sector working hours."
People are shutting down their government not only because they would possibly have to work 2.5 more hours per week, but because they also want the law of the land to be such that private sector workers can't work more than 37.5 hours per week. This is madness! As I've reported before on this blog, in various socialist European states there are actually laws in place that disallow private businesses from staying open later than their competition. This race to mediocrity is chilling.
But, even more chilling, is the break-neck speed with which we are heading in Greece's (and Europe's) general direction. When you grow the size and scope of the federal government - even in the name of compassion, fairness, and equality - the individual, private citizen grows less and less significant. The entrepreneurial activity of society's most productive members is squelched and discouraged. Religious life dwindles. Culture decays.
At our core, mankind was made to work. To create. To innovate. And ultimately, to worship their Maker. Take away, disrupt, or distort any of these things and your civilization is on the path to ruin.
It's not too late to change, America. We don't have to hate our political enemies, but we must start to take offense at the Left's ideas/policies, and take action every 2, 4, and 6 years at the voting booth.
According to a poll published in the center-left Ethnos newspaper earlier this month, 67.7% of Greeks think the government should proceed with economic reforms, and 63.7% supported the need for privatization or other measures to exploit state-owned assets. A further 59.7% said they supported abolishing the current life-time job guarantee for public servants.
We must not allow for a tyranny of the minority. Unions comprise less than 10% of the workforce in this country. Enough is enough.
President Obama Makes Me Laugh
Literally. I have to hand it to the guy (aka "his writers"): his performance at The White House Correspondence Dinner last weekend was very funny.
The president nailed the jokes that were written for him and showed that he already has Trump on the brain.
The crazy thing is, the president knew that an operation to kill Osama bin Laden was planned for that day (Saturday), had been scrapped due to weather, and was waiting to be carried out the following day. That takes concentration to be able to deliver Lion King and The Apprentice jokes with that information in the back of your mind.
Happy St. Patrick’s Day
From The Irish Times:
St Patrick’s Day is a religious commemoration of the man who converted Ireland to Christianity. It then became a symbol of Irish nationality. There will be no recovery worth its name without the spiritual, moral and cultural dimensions which renew Ireland’s self-understanding and confidence. That poses great challenges. But it is well within our capacity so long as good policies and favourable circumstances allow.
Some great sentiments from the Irish on a day mainly known for the over-service of alcohol. (For more on the real story of St. Patty's Day, click here.)
Chicago loves its Irish so much, we dye our river Al Gore-green every March 17th.

Krauthammer on union battles in WI, OH, and IN
Nobody does it like the German-hammer:
The magnificent turmoil now gripping statehouses in Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana and soon others marks an epic political moment. The nation faces a fiscal crisis of historic proportions and, remarkably, our muddled, gridlocked, allegedly broken politics have yielded singular clarity.
At the federal level, President Obama's budget makes clear that Democrats are determined to do nothing about the debt crisis, while House Republicans have announced that beyond their proposed cuts in discretionary spending, their April budget will actually propose real entitlement reform. Simultaneously, in Wisconsin and other states, Republican governors are taking on unsustainable, fiscally ruinous pension and health-care obligations, while Democrats are full-throated in support of the public-employee unions crying, "Hell, no."
A choice, not an echo: Democrats desperately defending the status quo; Republicans charging the barricades.
Wisconsin is the epicenter. It began with economic issues. When Gov. Scott Walker proposed that state workers contribute more to their pension and health-care benefits, he started a revolution. Teachers called in sick. Schools closed. Demonstrators massed at the capitol. Democratic senators fled the state to paralyze the Legislature.
Dr. Charles continues:
Recognizing this threat to union power, the Democratic Party is pouring money and fury into the fight. Fewer than 7 percent of private-sector workers are unionized. The Democrats' strength lies in government workers, who now constitute a majority of union members and provide massive support to the party. For them, Wisconsin represents a dangerous contagion.
Hence the import of the current moment - its blinding clarity. Here stand the Democrats, avatars of reactionary liberalism, desperately trying to hang on to the gains of their glory years - from unsustainable federal entitlements for the elderly enacted when life expectancy was 62 to the massive promissory notes issued to government unions when state coffers were full and no one was looking.
Obama's Democrats have become the party of no. Real cuts to the federal budget? No. Entitlement reform? No. Tax reform? No. Breaking the corrupt and fiscally unsustainable symbiosis between public-sector unions and state governments? Hell, no.
We have heard everyone - from Obama's own debt commission to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - call the looming debt a mortal threat to the nation. We have watched Greece self-immolate. We can see the future. The only question has been: When will the country finally rouse itself?
Amazingly, the answer is: now. Led by famously progressive Wisconsin - Scott Walker at the state level and Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan at the congressional level - a new generation of Republicans has looked at the debt and is crossing the Rubicon. Recklessly principled, they are putting the question to the nation: Are we a serious people?
Here's more from Chuck on Special Report with Brett Baier:
I Agree With Bill Maher
I know it's shocking to read that headline above, but it's true. A week or so after the comedian got under my skin, he stood his ground in a confrontation with a silly man named Tavis Smiley who was on his most recent panel. Take a look:
To be to the Left of Bill Maher is quite a feat. Tavis Smiley is the same guy who had this to say last year regarding the "moral equivalency" between Christians and Muslims in the world:
I think Mr. Smiley's words speak for themselves.
A Wild Weekend in Mad-town
Some of you may already know, but I was sent on behalf of Ricochet.com to cover the events surrounding the protests in Madison, WI Saturday. The battle between Governor Walker (R) and the teacher unions has been intense and garnered national attention for nearly a week. If you're still unclear about the details of this ideological clash, read this.
I submitted a two-part report of the day's events to the good people at Ricochet, which you can read below:
Part I: From Madison, With Love
Part II: More From Madison, WI
It was a fascinating experience, one I'm all-too-happy to share with my readers and friends. Part I has a YouTube montage of some of the better signs we saw, and Part II is a more in-depth and personal reflection on the people and ideas involved.
We are a better country when both sides of an ideological argument clearly articulate their respective position. Be ready to give an account for the things you say you believe.
More on the situation in Wisconsin to follow (because I am confident that similar showdowns are coming to a state near you).


