“Shocked” By Black Republicans
Let's assume that the labeling of Fox News as a "right-wing" network is true...what does this then say about MSNBC?
The network was, of course, "surprised" by the fact that there are a handful of black Americans running for elected federal office as Republicans. And what is worse: they're partnering with Tea Party groups in their respective areas! Gasp!
My beef is not with MSNBC having an opinion on the situation they're reporting on here. It's that absolutely no credit will be given to conservatives or Republicans for attracting ethnically diverse candidates.
And speaking of the tragic mis-placed loyalty blacks have had to the Democrat Party, here's an excerpt from Dr. Walter E. Williams' latest column on that very subject:
Tragically, most Americans, including black people whose ancestors have suffered from gross injustices of slavery, think it quite proper for government to forcibly use one person to serve the purposes of another. That's precisely what income redistribution is: the practice of forcibly taking the fruits of one person's labor for the benefit of another. That's also what theft is and the practice differs from slavery only in degree but not kind.
What about blacks who cherish liberty and limited government and joined in the tea party movement, or blacks who are members of organizations such as the Lincoln Institute, Frederick Douglass Foundation and Project 21? They've been maligned as Oreos, Uncle Toms and traitors to their race. To make such a charge borders on stupidity, possibly racism. After all, when President Reagan disagreed with Tip O'Neill, did either charge the other with being a traitor to his race? Then why is it deemed traitorous when one black disagrees with another, unless you think that all blacks must think alike?
I hope it's misunderstanding, rather than contempt, that explains black hostility toward the principles of liberty.
Noooooooooo!!!
Say it ain't so! The Chicago Tribune is reporting today that Rahm "Rahmbo" Emanuel says that he wants to be the next mayor of my beloved Chicago.
"I hope Mayor [Richard] Daley seeks re-election. I will work and support him if he seeks re-election," Emanuel told Charlie Rose on the host's PBS talk show, in an interview broadcast Monday night. "But if Mayor Daley doesn't, one day I would like to run for mayor of the city of Chicago. That's always been an aspiration of mine, even when I was in the House of Representatives."
In January, after The Washington Post reported that Emanuel, a one-time Daley aide and longtime supporter of the mayor, was mulling a mayoral run, Emanuel did not deny the report. He instead said in statement that he was "100 percent focused on the job at hand: serving President Obama as his chief of staff."
The citizens of big cities like Chicago, Detroit, and New Orleans wonder why corruption reigns supreme, why the bureaucracies are always so wildly ineffective and inefficient, and why things never seem to change. The answer is of course complex and layered in a dizzying array of supplemental causes, but the heart of the problem is the worldview liberal Democrats like Rahm Emanuel (and his current boss) deeply hold.
He believes in bigger government, regardless the results. He believes that "experts" from Ivy League schools can engineer society from their ivory towers. He believes that centralization of power is key to solving a city, state, and country's woes.
What a city like Chicago needs, and I can't believe I'm saying this, is a Ron Paul-type to rein in spending, cut budgets, and make fiscal responsibility a higher priority than the arbitrarily-defined "social justice" that bleeding-heart liberals from Berkeley to Boston use to ruin economies, undermine private property, and encroach on Americans' individual rights.
Stay in D.C. for Obama's one term, Rahmbo.
November 2010: Country/Back
By: R.J. Moeller
While in the car on the way to grocery store the other day I was "treated" to Justin Timberlake performing a lovely live rendition of his profound, insightful ditty "Sexy/Back." As I listened to the trite refrains, lyrics of my own began to formulate... 
I’m takin’ country back (Yeah!)
Them Dem’s and Lib’s don’t know how to act (Yeah!)
We need another Newt’s Contract (Yeah!)
It’s time we all pick up the slack (Yeah!)
(Take ‘em to the mid-terms)
Okay, so Justin Timberlake likely won’t be placing a “Featuring: R.J. ‘Moeller Bear’ Moeller” label on one of his hot tracks anytime soon – but maybe he should. I have a seemingly inexhaustible storehouse of ideas for witty political parodies set to the tune of popular songs in my noggin. I see myself sort of like a conservative version of Weird Al.
If Weird Al actually did comedy, that is.
Truth be told, in times like these, when the world around you has apparently gone something more desperate than “mad”, you have to be able to laugh at the seriousness of the trouble we’re in. They say that laughter is the best medicine, which I tend to agree with, but don’t miss the subtext of that cliché: it implies something is making you sick. I’m more than willing to look for the silver lining in our current politically (and culturally) dark clouds, but only if I know that the rest of you who share my general worldview and values are willing to help huff and puff and blow those cumulonimbuses clouds of “change” back from whence they came.
We’re flooded in debt, deficits, and rampant corruption, and the Left’s plan seems to center around the busting up of the last cultural, economic, and moral dams keeping the flood-waters of national depression at bay.
To all Conservatives, Libertarians, Republicans, and sensible moderates: STOP participating in the collectivist-inspired “Rain Dance” that liberals, Leftists, and progressives promise you has nothing to do with their insatiable ideological desire for growing the size, scope, power, and influence of the federal government! It’s not merely “all about the children” to Nancy Pelosi and President Obama. They believe true compassion is best facilitated via the IRS.
The problem throughout human history has not been that that bad people will do bad things, or that dumb people will do dumb things, but that good people, wise people, will sit idly by while Rome burns. You can count on the enemies of the truth to fight for their side, but with almost the same degree of certainty you can count on those who are in fact on the side of truth to fail to appreciate the gravity of the truth they have graciously been given access to.
Such is the case of the modern Center-Right coalition of otherwise God-fearing, tax-paying, neighbor-waving Americans.
For at least two consecutive generations in this country, the would-be defenders of liberty, limited government, the republican (small “r”) synthesis of personal responsibility with civic duty, and Judeo-Christian values have ceded the historical, economic, and theological solid ground that is rightly theirs to stand on. While activists on the Left read Saul Alinsky, made in-roads with inner city minorities, passed society-changing legislation, motivated young people to vote, and infiltrated every level of the media, entertainment industry, and education system, conservatives (especially religious ones) spent their time convincing themselves that their only duties were to make a good living, keep to themselves, and send their kids to Sunday School (unless Sunday School conflicted with soccer games, of course).
The time for such short-sighted, “stage one” thinking has come to an end…or the American “experiment” in republican democracy will.
It is inexpressibly praiseworthy to be a hardworking conservative who provides for his or her family. And there is nothing I want more for Americans than for them to seek God out and attend weekly religious services. But it is not enough. Not if you care about the fate of your country. Not if you care about the lives (and souls) being crushed by their enslavement to welfare entitlements. Not if the taking of 50 million lives due to abortion matters to your conscience. Not if you believe, as I do, that the health or sickness of a society rests squarely on the shoulders of the institution of marriage (and the subsequent family it logically produces). Not if staggering, crushing debt left to your children’s children is as morally objectionable a thought to you as it is to me.
Not if the truth matters.
It is a frustratingly interesting thing to watch from the perspective of a white, suburban-living male in his 20’s as all of the parents and business owners and pastors and teachers and soccer moms around me talk about being “conservative” or believing in “traditional moral values” and then don’t even take the time to vote, or read one Wall Street Journal article per week, or investigate the ideology of political candidates, or peruse even small excerpts from massive pieces of legislation that will impact their lives forever if not repealed.
Again, I have nothing but the utmost respect for the dad and mom whose primary focus is appropriately centered on providing for their kids and doing unto others as they would have done to them. I see men and women in my church, in my neighborhood, at the grocery store and bank who I would give anything to be like in terms of their character, ethics, and integrity. But a depressing percentage of those same honorable Americans are almost entirely checked out from the cultural battles being won every day by people and ideologies that contradict nearly everything they say they believe in.
The reasons for this are plentiful. For some, they have convinced themselves that they are simply too busy and stressed to cross that threshold from an oblivious to an informed citizen. Others are lazy, and so the thought of showing up to a town hall meeting to engage their elected representative on a boring topic like the fate of 300 million peoples’ health care is not even on their radar. Still others have capitulated to their emotions (at the expense of their intellect and the facts) and have accepted what their liberal sociology professor said freshmen year of college about “Republicans hating change” and “Democrats loving poor people and the earth.” This type of person knows they have conservative leanings in the areas of abortion and traditional marriage, but have not heard (or sought out) any fellow conservatives or conservative organizations that encompass a pro-life, pro-free markets stance with a serious passion for thoughtful environmental stewardship and for helping “the least among us.”
I believe that the main reason conservatives, a bloc of voters and taxpayers that is double the size of self-described liberal progressives (40 to 21%), have so many in their ranks who are disengaged and apathetic when it comes to social, political, and cultural issues is a pervasive lack of knowledge. Simply put: people don’t know what is going on.
No one but God has all the answers, and there are no perfect candidates, and even a person who holds the right position on an issue can do the wrong thing in advancing their side’s cause, but none of those realities condone apathy, indifference, intellectual laziness, and the shirking of the duties a free citizen has had bestowed upon them by the countless millions who died to give them that freedom and opportunity.
November of 2010 can be the beginning of a new day for you personally, and the dawn of a new age of inquiry, debate, discourse, and participation for America and her blessed people. You don’t have to lurk in the shadows of confusion and hearsay when it comes to the issues that matter to you any longer. You don’t have to concede the moral debates that underpin those issues to liberals and progressives who win them for no other reason than that they have no one seriously opposing them on the Right.
You can put down the remote and pick up a Kindle. You can trade your People subscription for a National Review one. You can take your kids to a history museum instead of Lego Land. You can send your nephew or granddaughter Mark Levin’s Liberty and Tyranny instead of R.L. Stine’s Goosebumps. On your way to and from work, you can cruise the dial to hear thoughtful, creative dissemination of conservative values and principles from the likes of Michael Medved and Dennis Prager on the Salem Radio Network affiliate in your area instead of hunkering down on a Top 40 station for mindless lyrics set to sampled beats.
If you are a college or graduate student, come discover the booming world of conservative intellectual thought that is being led by groups like American Enterprise Institute, The Discovery Institute, The Heritage Foundation, and my personal favorite, The Acton Institute. Acton has conferences and events throughout the year intentionally aimed at helping conservatives under the age of 30 interact with the intersection of faith, economics, politics, and the culture.
If you are an adult with a job and family who is unsure as to how best to get involved, the place to start is by equipping yourself with the information needed to make the case for your values. Get a subscription to the Wall Street Journal. On a weekly, if not daily, basis monitor sites like Drudereport.com, Townhall.com, Heritage.org, and Realclearpolitics.com. Watch Charles Krauthammer and the Fox News All-Stars break down the top stories of the day each evening from 5:40-6:00pm (Central time). Find out when the next town hall or school board meeting is taking place in your area and read up on the topic being discussed so you can participate. If you are so inclined, attend a Tea Party rally this spring and summer. Call your local elected officials and voice your opinion. Pray for your country.
The Theology, History, and Economics of Mere Conservatism is a good place to start.
I realize that some will react to what I’ve said here today with a skeptical attitude. They’ll think that what I’m proposing is that everyone should just read conservative blogs and listen to conservative talk radio and then everything will be fine. They’ll tell themselves that it is people like R.J. Moeller who ratchet up the heated level of back-and-forth, partisan political bickering in this country. They’ll attempt to reassure themselves that the best route is moderation (and by “moderation” they mean “doing nothing, but claiming to know the answers to everything come election time or political discussion around the Thanksgiving table”).
I close with my two rebuttals to such concerns.
First, while filling your mind with only one side of anything is never the best policy in life, who among you would argue that you’re unsure about what liberal Democrats think of things like the environment, abortion, welfare, or bigger government in general? We’ve learned liberalism from liberals, but we’ve also learned conservatism from liberals. The balance of the time you spend learning more about economics, politics, and cultural topics will need to be slightly shifted towards the Right (at least initially) to catch up on a lifetime of liberal indoctrination and persistent misrepresentations of what conservatives actually believe.
Second, we need people to know what they are talking about before we can have a serious dialogue about the direction of our ideology (conservatism) and our nation (America). You can’t prescribe a remedy when you aren’t sure of the medicinal options out there, or perhaps even of the sickness afflicting you, your ideology, or your nation. We need to recognize where we agree (and why we agree on those things) before we can establish where we differ. I want skeptics who generally agree with me to be welcomed into the conservative, Center-Right coalition for it will be their ideas, activism and instruction to their children that will either sink or save the United States.
The mid-term elections in November are roughly seven months away. This summer could be your “Road to Damascus” moment when the veils of apathy, indifference, and misinformation are finally lifted from your mind and heart’s eyes. Elections don’t fix America; Americans fix America.
But while elections cannot fix America, they absolutely can lead to the erosion of it.
Putting people into the highest reaches of power who have as a core tenet of their worldview the growth of their own power is contrary to the historical, legal, and philosophical underpinnings of the nation we love and cherish. We do need to take our country back, but not for the GOP or Democrats or even Ralph Nader. We need to take our country back for the ideas, ideals, and values it represents and the overwhelming majority of us believe in.
Who you vote for is the last step in a journey that begins with a realization that freedom isn’t free; that you cannot divorce what you love about your city, state, and country from your duty to them.
Go get involved. You know you want to, and the rest of us need you to.
Max Baucus Ought To Make You Mad
Senator Max Baucus (D-Montana), in a moment of clarity last week, explained what Obamacare and the health care "reform" congress has ill-advisedly passed is really all about.
Thanks for at least being honest with us, Max. Too bad it was after the fact. I think it is safe to say that a litmus test for whether you are a conservative or not is if this video makes your skin crawl. If what Senator Baucus says in this clip is in no conflict with your general worldview about the size and role of government, then you are a liberal. It's really as simple as that.
Read more on the Baucus story from the blokes over at BigGovernment.com here.
Senator Evan Bayh: Gone, Baby, Gone
We are likely witnessing the implosion of the Democrat Party. Think of how different things were a year ago!
The latest Democrat to abandon the proverbial sinking ship is Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN). Writing today at National Review Online, RiShawn Biddle diagnoses what he believes to have been Senator Bayh's fatal flaw:
Certainly there is speculation that Bayh may seek the Democratic presidential nomination — or even attempt an independent presidential campaign
— in 2012 or 2016. This assumes that Bayh can repeat his past success in presenting himself as one of the Democratic party’s more centrist players. But it was precisely this well-practiced fence-straddling between conservatism and liberalism that led to Bayh’s downfall. The anger and fatigue among Hoosier voters over the current recession — combined with President Obama’s unpopularity — are hurting all Democrats, but Bayh was hurt even worse by the perception among both conservatives and liberals that he stood for his own political ambitions (and occasionally, his wife’s business interests) than for any consistent ideology.
The danger of demonstrating such an absence of strong, thoughtful political positions should be kept in mind by Republicans and Democrats alike. It is often better to be principled (and even a tad ideological) to a fault than to be milquetoast by a mile.
Please understand that the precipitous decline in the popularity of Democrats among voters does not spell certain success for the GOP come 2010 and 2012. Nor should it. Republicans absolutely blew their chance to curtail spending, drastically cut taxes, and return our national focus to the original intent of the US Constitution. That didn't happen.
But things can change. Parties can change. They change when voters show up to primaries and town halls and call/email their local representatives. They change when voters start following their leaders and keeping score for themselves (instead of letting the media re-writer history every chance they get).
The folks in Washington are terrified of you and me. Evan Bayh is just the latest in an increasingly long line of politicians who have read the poll numbers on the wall (so to speak) and know they are donzo.
Although he declared that his decision was motivated by his desire to escape the “strident partisanship” of the present-day Senate and his interest in finding “better ways to serve my fellow citizens,” he faced the prospect of losing the seat in the same fashion his legendary father did 30 years ago. According to internal party polls just three months ago, he was polling at 63 percent; by late January, the junior senator from Indiana had the support of a mere 45 percent of likely voters surveyed by Rasmussen Reports.
Keep up the fight, America. Charles Krauthammer and the Fox News All-stars are behind you:
Newt and 2+2=4
There's not debate in my mind that New Gingrich is the the most capable, informed, articulate politician since Ronald Reagan. A lot of people feel very strongly one way or the other about the former Speaker of the House, but believe me when I say that he should be the next GOP nominee for president in 2012. That might shock some of you, and I realize that Newt is no stranger to controversy, but no one else has the experience, ideas, and ability to communicate that he possesses.
For the liberal reader, I understand you'll never like Newt; but for the Right-of-Center visitor to this site, all I am saying...is give Newt a chance. Listen to what he has to say. Visit his site. (His many sites). Investigate what he's been up to the past 6 years. Think of what this man could do to Barack Obama in a debate on national television!
Here's a little taste of the clarity and wisdom of Gingrich:
Brown Brings Home The Bacon
There is justice in a world where Ted Kennedy's senate seat will be the deciding vote against Obamacare.
In the infamous words of George W. Bush: "You did a heckuva job, Brownie!"
Scott Brown (R) is the now the junior senator from the state of Massachusetts. He also has two really cute daughters. Seriously, check them out standing on either side of his podium. (I know two gals who will soon be my Facebook friends.)
A month ago no one gave the guy a shot. Some say it was a referendum on President Obama and the far-Left Democrats running things in Washington the past year. Some say it was a poor candidate for the Dems in Martha Coakley. Whatever the reasons, and I believe they are many, the Republicans now have the key 41st vote to oppose health care, cap-and-trade, and every other top-down socialist policy the current administration attempts to ram down our throats.
There are some tensions between the Coakley campaign and the Obama White House, so you be the judge if this was a parting shot or not from her concession speech:
Coakley said she received a phone call from President Barack Obama: “He actually just called me before I came onstage to say that we can’t win them all, and he knows that better than any, as he told me."
The next controversy surrounding this historic election in MA will be how quickly Senator-elect Brown will be seated in the US Senate. If Democrats try some chicanery to stall things so they can push health care through, they will have sealed their fates in 2010 and 2012. I predict they won't be so foolish, but who knows with this group of "lackluster" politicians.
Come Meet Robert Dold
If you live in the 10th Congressional District of Illinois you're probably already aware that Mark Kirk (R) is on the ticket for Senator in 2010. That means we need to find someone new to represent the Fighting 10th. I believe the best choice for that open seat is Robert Dold.
Tomorrow evening, Wednesday December 30th, from 5:00 to 7:00pm Dold will be holding a "Know The Candidate" meet-and-greet and Q & A at the Arlington Heights Memorial Library. The event will be held in the Hendrickson Room, which is on the top floor of the library.
If you live in the area and care at all about getting to know the candidates before the primary elections in early February, PLEASE come out and join us. There is no cost and light refreshments will be served. Email me (rj@rjmoeller.com) if you have any questions.
Tell a friend!



