Eric Holder Is A Clown
I'm sorry, but he is. Watch this exchange he had with a congressman during a hearing this last week on the recent slew of terrorist attacks (and what common denominator they "might" all have):
Feel safer, knowing this guy's the top law-man in the country right now?
Mark Steyn doesnt, and here are his thoughts on the matter.
Hard To Believe Your Ears
David Horowitz is a conservative author who has written many books and articles on the radically-Left atmosphere on most secular university and college campuses. Horowitz recently spoke at University of California-San Diego on the topic of militant Islamic terrorism and was questioned by a female Muslim student afterward.
The exchange is chilling. Listen close to the girl's words.
This exchange didn't occur on an Iranian campus, or even in Europe: it happened here. There are people who believe this rubbish, that Jews should congregate in Israel so it will be easier to "drive them into the sea", right here in America. Sadly, universities lend themselves to such radicalism because somewhere along the way our institutions of higher learning sold themselves (and us) on the notion that ANY idea or theory posited and explored is a noble one. Objective truth (i.e. a terrorist group like Hamas, or Hezbollah, is evil) becomes too rigid a standard for the enlightened elites. These elites are the policy-makers and supreme court justices and educators of future generations of Americans.
What ends up happening is that the people who promote such muddled "thinking" eventually have no answer for extremists (of any faith) that come along and promote views and beliefs that are irreconcilable with the liberty-loving system we've enjoyed for more than 200 years.
As Chesterton once wrote, "There are thoughts that end thought. And those are the only thoughts which ought to be ended."
My heart breaks for this young woman. She is the initial victim, having been raised to want to murder an entire ethnicity of people. We then become the victims when we do not do everything in our power to combat such hateful, evil ideology.
All opinions are welcome in a free society; not all are right.
Steyn’s “Uncommon” Knowledge
National Review Online's Peter Robinson (former Reagan speechwriter) hosts a compelling interview series entitled "Uncommon Knowledge" every week on the NRO website. This past week he spent some time in conversation with my personal favorite political/cultural commentator, one Mark Steyn.
Here's Part 1, but do yourself a huge favor and check out all 5.
If you've yet to read Steyn's tour-de-force, America Alone, throw away whatever book is setting on your nightstand and buy this thing.
Please.
Political Correctness is Cowardice
From the UK's Daily Mail:
A Christian teacher yesterday claimed he was forced out of his job after complaining that Muslim pupils as young as eight hailed the September 11 hijackers as heroes.
This poor guy, Nicholas Kafouris, is a teacher in a school and classroom dominated by young, aggressive Muslim students who un-apologetically promote the views we often associate with terrorists living in caves.
The predominantly Muslim youngsters openly praised Islamic extremists in class and described the September 11 terrorists as 'heroes and martyrs'.
One pupil said: 'Don't touch me, you're a Christian' when he brushed against him.
Others said: 'We want to be Islamic bombers when we grow up', and 'The Christians and Jews are our enemies - you too because you're a Christian'.
Seems reasonable, right? The teacher involved here filed complaints time after time and his boss at the school told him to get lost. Could it be because she feared reprisal from the radical students' radical parents?
Political correctness prevents real justice. It distorts reality and clouds sound judgment, all in the name of "playing nice." These students should have been warned, punished, and if the behavior continued - kicked out the school.
But what else do you expect from a country whose leaders are increasingly "cool with" Sharia Law being implemented within its own borders? It's sad really, and should be a HUGE wake-up call for Americans who naively think it could never happen here.
Krauthammer Weighs In On Fort Hood
I would be remiss if I did not post Charles Krauthammer's thoughts on the Fort Hood terrorist attack last week.
Chuck points out that the only people having a tough time describing Major Nidal Hasan as a Muslim jihadist are members of the media.
But, of course, if the shooter is named Nidal Hasan, whom National Public Radio reported had been trying to proselytize doctors and patients, then something must be found. Presto! Secondary post-traumatic stress disorder, a handy invention to allow one to ignore the obvious.
And the perfect moral finesse. Medicalizing mass murder not only exonerates. It turns the murderer into a victim, indeed a sympathetic one. After all, secondary PTSD, for those who believe in it (you won’t find it in DSM-IV-TR, psychiatry’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual), is known as “compassion fatigue.” The poor man — pushed over the edge by an excess of sensitivity.
Have we totally lost our moral bearings? Nidal Hasan (allegedly) cold-bloodedly killed 13 innocent people. In such cases, political correctness is not just an abomination. It’s a danger, clear and present.
He continues, discussing the warning signs that Maj. Hasan clearly exhibited to his colleagues in Maryland before being shipped to Fort Hood:
Was anything done about this potential danger? Of course not. Who wants to be accused of Islamophobia and prejudice against a colleague’s religion?
One must not speak of such things. Not even now. Not even after we know that Hasan was in communication with a notorious Yemen-based jihad propagandist. As late as Tuesday, the New York Times was running a story on how returning soldiers at Fort Hood had a high level of violence.
What does such violence have to do with Hasan? He was not a returning soldier. And the soldiers who returned home and shot their wives or fellow soldiers didn’t cry “Allahu Akbar!” as they squeezed the trigger.
The delicacy about the religion in question — condescending, politically correct, and deadly — is nothing new. A week after the first (1993) World Trade Center attack, the same New York Times ran the following front-page headline about the arrest of one Mohammed Salameh: “Jersey City Man Is Charged in Bombing of Trade Center.”
Ah yes, those Jersey men — so resentful of New York, so prone to violence.
Can we “jump” yet?
The politically correct insanity that is crippling this country knows no bounds. Within 24 hours of the terrorist attack on Fort Hood we knew that the suspect was named Nidal Malik Hasan, was a devout Muslim, spoke openly to his clients and colleagues alike about his radical Muslm views, had given copies of the Koran away to friends and neighbors the day before the murders took place, had been a member in social networking groups which extolled the virtues of suicide bombing, and, oh by the way, according to eye witness reports, had screamed "Allahu Akbar!" (God is Great!) before and during his rampage on the innocent victims in Texas.
And with all of that evidence, every liberal in America, from President Obama to Anderson Cooper to Homeland Security Chief Janet Napalitano, insisted that no one "jump to any conclusions."
Really? Conclusions about what? Not that the man might have been motivated by his perverted view of Islam to slaughter fellow soldiers, right? Who would think such a thing?
Do you have any ketchup popsicles to sell me that might match my new white gloves?
But don't believe this sarcastic blogger that what happened at Fort Hood was most certainly terrorism. From ABC News:
U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was attempting to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.
The military knew this man was insane, and yet let him continue to be the person soldiers came to for counseling after fighting in a war that Hasan hated (only slightly more than Code Pink and the anti-war Left in this country).
I'm gonna let Mark Steyn take this blog-post home with an excerpt from his latest, and I dare say brilliant, column:
When it emerged early Thursday afternoon that the shooter was Nidal Malik Hasan, there appeared shortly thereafter on Twitter a flurry of posts with the striking formulation: "Please judge Maj. Malik Nadal [sic] by his actions and not by his name."
Concerned tweeters can relax: There was never really any danger of that – and not just in the sense that the New York Times' first report on Maj. Hasan never mentioned the words "Muslim" or "Islam," or that ABC's Martha Raddatz's only observation on his name was that "as for the suspect, Nadal Hasan, as one officer's wife told me, 'I wish his name was Smith.'"
What a strange reaction. I suppose what she means is that, if his name were Smith, we could all retreat back into the same comforting illusions that allowed the bureaucracy to advance Nidal Malik Hasan to major and into the heart of Fort Hood while ignoring everything that mattered about the essence of this man.
Honestly, this might be one of the most important articles you ever read. Please finish Steyn's masterpiece right here.
Tragedy at Fort Hood
There's little I can or should say about the massacre that took place at Fort Hood in Texas yesterday afternoon. By now most everyone in the country knows about it. Details regarding the motives of the killer will continue to leak out in the coming days and weeks, but I just hope that if this really was motivated by the man's admittedly perverted understanding of the Muslim faith, we will have the courage and honesty to report it and discuss its implications.
One thing that I wanted all of you to see, and you can make your own judgments about it, is the bizarre remarks President Obama made after hearing about the shootings.
This from our Commander-in-Chief.
So much honor killing, so little time
There are some stories we come across that we simply cannot ignore. This is one of those. A 17-year old girl, Rifqa Bary, converted from being a Muslim to being a Christian earlier this year and her devout Muslim father threatened her life. She ran away to Florida, but because she is not a naturalized citizen the courts will likely send her home to Ohio where her parents reside. She fears for her life. Many Muslim fathers and male relatives (even here in the West) have killed their own daughter/sister/cousin because of various "dishonors" she has supposedly brought to their family.
Please watch this brief video where in her own words, Rifqa explains her plight.
What a mess! Please be praying for this brave soul. For those of you who don't believe that values matter, and that all societies and countries and religions are the same, let this story be a wake up call.
Sad Beyond Words

I don't really know what to even say about this story from the Jerusalem Post entitled "I Wed Iranian Girls Before Their Execution". Mark Steyn had his brief reaction to it here, but the terror that many women face every day of their lives in Sharia-ruled nations is a chilling reality.
An excerpt from the JP story:
In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a "wedding" ceremony is conducted the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard - essentially raped by her "husband."




Nonsense On Stilts
Tavis Smiley is a liberal television talk show host on, shockingly, PBS. Let the surprise of a Left-leaning commentator being the host of a show on publicly-funded television sink in. Take deep breaths.
Better?
In what the late British philosopher Jeremy Bentham would have described as "nonsense on stilts," Mr. Smiley tries to convince a Somalian former Muslim woman named Ayaan Hirsi Ali that, "...more Christians (than Muslims) blow up people everyday." Hear it for yourself:
I don't even know where to begin. Well, that's not true: Tavis Smiley is probably a good man, loving husband, and doting father...but he is an utter fool if he really believes what he said in this clip. If his only point is that people who call themselves "Christian" commit crimes every day of the week, then he is right. But Ms. Ali is talking about attempted (and successful) mass-murder, perpetrated by men who believe that their religion compels them to end the lives of "infidels."
The reason I know that Smiley is not simply pointing out that people from all faiths and cultures commit crimes is, well, because I listened to his own words. He sees moral equivalency between American Christians and the irreconcilable wing of Islam. This is because he is a liberal, and the bizarre and instiable desire for "multiculturalism" trumps the truth on the political Left in this country. It's sad, and I wish it were not so, but I also wish LOST had another season or two.
The priceless moment of the exchange came when he tried to link the Columbine massacre to Christian terrorism. Now for someone to be totally unaware that the Columbine killers were not religious, and in fact executed one of their victims specifically for refusing to renounce her faith in Christ in front of them, is hard to believe. Especially when that person is a supposed cultural commentator on publicly-funded television (PBS...your tax-dollars at work!).
This is why I stress the importance of History on this blog so often. Here is a classic example of someone using a past event to try to make his ill-advised point, but since neither he nor his guest (Ms. Ali only recently moved to the United States and would understandably be unfamiliar with the specifics of the Columbine incident) knew the facts of the event in question, he was able to get away with an egregious intellectual error (that fundamentally contradicts his point).
So why would Tavis Smiley, himself a self-described Christian, be so gun-ho about defending the indefensible actions of radical jihadist Muslims? Because he is really more interested in attacking his political opponents here in America. He is really talking about "right-wing" Christians. The kind that form weird militias and cults. The kind that chant "God hates fags" at the funerals of American soldiers. The kind that "cling to their guns and religion" instead of embracing the socially-engineered arms of the State.
In short, the (largely incorrect) caricature liberals have of the typical religious conservative in "Red-State" America. Never mind the fact that all leading conservative voices in the country denounce the actions of any even loosely-related-to-the-conservative-movement crazies, such as the loons at the Westboro Baptist Church.
But it doesn't matter that Christian conservatives denounce things like the abortion doctor killing last summer. Bill Clinton blamed the Oklahoma City bombing on Rush Limbaugh's anti-Clinton rhetoric in the mid-1990's. Liberals in the media insist on naming Timothy McVeigh as a "Christian" terrorist. The Left consistently over-looks foreign enemies and true evil to try and crush their political enemies here at home.
You can make your own further assessments of this interview, but just know that the "thinking" employed by Tavis Smiley is not rare on the Left. It is all-too-common and must be refuted. The truth matters, my friends.