Summer Movie Reviews over at NRO’s The Corner
National Review Online's "The Corner" blog is a constant source of information, insight, and pithy reflections on the passing scene. Today NRO's Ben Shapiro has an interesting review of the big summer blockbusters already out, and yet-to-come.

It’s that time of year again: time for the summer movie, the blockbuster, the movie all your friends are seeing and talking about. Sure, you’ll waste a bunch of money on duds such as Star Wars: Episode I (damn you, George Lucas, and your yes men!), but there’s always a shot you’ll see Inception — something surprisingly smart, tremendously entertaining, and beautifully done.
In the spirit of hope, then, let’s take a look at twelve of the biggest blockbusters coming up (and that have already come out) this summer.
X-Men: First Class
Loved it. Yes, I know that it portrays the Soviets and the Americans as two sides of the same coin, and shows America’s placement of Jupiter missiles in Turkey as a provocative cause of the Cuban missile crisis. Yes, I understand that the villain of the piece, Sebastian Shaw, utters lines such as “If you’re not with us, then by definition, you are against us.” Yes, I realize that American soldiers and the CIA are portrayed as sexist bullies intent on destroying anything that doesn’t fit their cookie-cutter worldview. I don’t care. The movie’s great. I haven’t seen a more entertaining and emotionally cathartic scene than the Argentinian bar scene in a long time. Perhaps it’s a Jewish thing, but all my sympathies lie with Magneto (as do the screenwriter’s, clearly), and I find Professor X to be an accommodationist willfully blind to reality (at least in this movie).Mr. Popper’s Penguins
If you see this and you don’t have kids, I don’t even know why anyone would talk to you. If you see this and you do have kids, I’m wondering whether you need to give them a time out. Whenever you see previews for films like this, it makes you wonder whether a benevolent God actually exists.Green Lantern
The CGI looks bad. The acting looks bad. The plot looks bad. The reviews look bad. Why is Ryan Reynolds a movie star?Super 8
Have heard mixed reviews about this one. On the one hand, my good friend Kurt Schlichter ripped this movie up and down for its anti-military pretentions; on the other hand, it’s J.J. Abrams and Steven Spielberg, and Spielberg’s due for a good movie (isn’t he?). Also, it’s about aliens, which is Spielberg’s specialty. He’s not nearly as good with human beings — Saving Private Ryan is overrated, except for the D-Day sequence, and Schindler’s List is a gussying-up of the Holocaust. (You may send the hate mail now.)
Read the rest of Shapiro's spirited reviews here. And let me know what you think of any of these flicks if you've already seen them.
“Exodus”: Good movie? Great movie?
I'm going to go with the latter option.
My roommates and I have a modest cable package, but the other night on one of the 11 different PBS-affiliate television stations we get they were showing the 1960 Paul Newman movie Exodus. It's been 4 years or so since I first saw the film, and I was only too delighted to DVR it and work my through the 208 minutes when I could find a spare 30 minutes here-and-there during the past week. Now that I've finished my piecemeal viewing, I thought I'd share a few of my thoughts on what was (yet again) a fantastic - dare I say great - movie.
First, a trailer for Exodus:
The story is fairly simple (and historical): After WWII ended, hundreds of thousands of European Jews decided that if the West did not want them, they would return to their ancestral homeland in Palestine (modern-day Israel). The Jews had been promised a state of their own all the way back in 1917 (The Balfour Declaration), but the British - who had been assigned the task of "keeping the peace" between Jews and Arab Muslims in Palestine - were in no hurry to make good on that promise. The status quo is what Great Britain (and to be fair, most world leaders) wanted. Everyone knew that eventually a vote among the member states of the United Nations would have to settle the matter. In the meantime, Jews already living in Palestine did everything in their power to get more of their people into the region. Numbers meant legitimacy.
Exodus is essentially a two-part movie. The first act is the detailed account of how Israeli secret agents devised a plan to "sneak" some 600 European Jews being held by the British on the island of Cyprus on to a boat and then on to Palestine. Paul Newman plays the fictional character Ari Ben-Caanan, a native of Palestine and a Jewish rebel who comes to Cyprus with plans for the mass escape. Eve Marie-Saint, of North By Northwest fame, is an American widow who while visiting Cyprus gets caught up in the whole affair when she attempts to adopt one of the young Jewish girls that came from Europe on the Exodus.
The second act of the film is all about the literal days leading up to the UN resolution for partition of Palestine. I don't want to give any more of the plot away, but I promise you will be entertained.
Yes, the movie is long. Yes, it was made before 1990. No, there are no gaudy sex scenes, cringe-worthy profanities, or vampires.
It is a story about faith, love, and the realities of a fallen world in which "good" usually doesn't win (but isn't any less worth fighting and dying for). Like many pre-Vietnam War epics, Exodus is a testament to the superb quality and moral clarity of "old Hollywood." The Hollywood of Jimmy Stewart and Ben-Hur. The Hollywood of powerful narrative and engaging plot development, not just CGI and a P.Diddy-produced soundtrack.
I really like this movie. I think you will too.
Steyn on “Strangers”
My favorite movies were made by Alfred Hitchcock. My favorite columns are written by Mark Steyn. When the two collide, blogs at rjmoeller.com happen.
Steyn is an eclectic guy, and his expertise wide-ranging. In a recent post on his website (steynonline.com) he honored the star of one of Hitch's best flicks: Farley Granger who played the leading role in Strangers on a Train.
Strangers on a Train | Farley Granger | Robert Walker | Movie Trailer | Review
Steyn posits:
Strangers On A Train is the film in which Hitchcock's fascination with duality - with doubles and double-crossing and crossing one's double - is most fruitfully explored. But it benefits from especially expert casting. Originally, William Holden was scheduled for the role of Guy Haines, but he turned it down and, as Hitch subsequently explained, he would have been all wrong. There is undoubtedly a homoerotic frisson to the weird relationship between Guy and the dissolute Bruno and the latter's concoction of a double-murder scheme to bind them together. Robert Walker's Bruno is the performance you remember - lurid, simpering, creepy, insinuating. But Farley Granger's rendering of Guy as bland, passive and insipid is absolutely critical to the balance of the film. An actor as strong as Holden would have ruined the focus and the symmetry. Hitchcock understood better than most directors then or now that few films can recover from casting.
Sixty years after Strangers On A Train, Hitchcock’s position seems more assured than ever. Even the unique if eccentric tribute of Gus van Sant's shot-for-shot remake of Psycho had been prefigured by the remakes of 1950s episodes of the Alfred Hitchcock TV series: they junked the old squaresville black-and-white actors, and re-shot them with hip full-color casts, replacing everybody except Hitchcock, whose arch 30-year old intros were left as is. But Strangers remains one of his most satisfying works, one in which he sets up a contrast not between good and evil but between evil (Bruno) and weakness (Guy). The visual style reinforces the theme: When we first meet them on the train, the director introduces us to his principals via their shows - the first pair entirely ordinary; the second, flashy two-tone brogues.
Even his trademark cameo supports the big picture. In Strangers On A Train, Hitchcock appears on screen ten minutes in, boarding the eponymous train with a unwieldy double-bass. That's both a droll jest, and a good example of his attention to detail: in a film about doubles, even Hitchcock must have a double.
I can't recommend this movie enough. If you're not used to watching movies made before 1980 (let alone 1960), it may take you a while to adjust to such out-dated features as story-telling, plot development, shots that last longer than 3 seconds, and talented directing.
If you want to borrow my DVD copy of the film, call me at 555-FILK.
Review of Tron:Legacy
Here's my review of the new Tron movie over at the K&R Blog. I started K&R this fall to be a place where things are a little lighter than the mostly-serious topics discussed here at AVITW. Coming this Spring, expect to see both more movie reviews and a bevvy of light-hearted, satirical content.
Your Network Seems Awfully “Social”
I was conflicted about seeing it, but today I went with a friend to a late afternoon viewing of David Fincher's The Social Network. The reason I was conflicted had to do with the fact that the trailers, apart from the haunting rendition of Radiohead's "Creep", made this film look like it would be...how do you say?...rubbish.
But the mere fact that Fincher (Seven, Fight Club, Benjamin Button, The Game) was directing is what got me (and my money) in the door. Social Network was #1 a the box-office this weekend and I have to say that I now understand why.
The type of person who doesn't (by now) know what this movie is about is the same type of person who doesn't use Facebook. So for the baker's dozen of you out there: it's about Facebook.
The story-line is fairly simple: Boy gets dumped by girl. Boy, in order to get "even" with girl, sets out to do something that will make her jealous. Boy creates most popular social networking website on the planet and becomes insanely wealthy. Boy is still miserable and alone, despite his success.
But while the general outline of the mostly-true tale is fairly conventional, the devil, or in this case, angel of interesting content, is in the details. For starters, Social Network works because no major motion picture actor or actress worked in it. Apart from a smaller role filled by pop star Justin Timberlake, basically all of the actors and actresses are relatively unknown and refreshingly believable.
It also works because the script is strong and dialogue engaging. The key characters are developed and as the audience becomes enveloped in the unfolding events, it is because we care about the key players (and not because they are in 3-D).
More than a movie, Social Network is a story. A good story. There is no real hero to the story, but plenty of lessons about greed, jealousy, integrity, and friendship to be learned.
The film is rated PG-13, due mostly to some coarse language and mild scenes of sensuality. You don't have to run your local cinema to see this flick: a mild cantor will do. It is worth a viewing at some point, especially if it leads to a good discussion with those you watch it with afterward.
Shutter Island: Hitchcock-inspired, Moeller-approved
by: R.J. Moeller
My favorite director is Alfred Hitchcock. No one told a story on the silver screen quite like "old Hitch." I especially love Vertigo, North By Northwest, and Notorious. Hitchcock mastered the psychological thriller, loved setting his stories amidst grandiose backdrops and landscapes, always paid great attention to detail, and usually crafted tales about characters who get caught up in things beyond their control.
Martin Scorsese is a legendary director in his own right, and although I am not very fond of his obsession with making ultra-violent films, his latest effort Shutter Island, is an effective homage to the greatness of Hitchcock.
As your eyes could tell you from the trailer, Leonardo DiCaprio stars in Shutter Island and does a fantastic job.
It's 1954 (the year Hitch's classic Rear Window was released), and U.S. Marshall Teddy Daniels (Leo) has been called to investigate the disappearance of an inmate at an island mental hospital for the criminally insane called Ashecliff off the coast of Massachusetts. Teddy's got his new partner Chuck (Mark Ruffalo) along for the investigation, but upon arrival, it becomes apparent to the characters (and audience) that something is not quite right on Shutter Island.
The prison guards are abnormally fidgety, the Marshals are both asked to turn over their firearms (something no federal agent typically has to do), and there is absolutely no trace of the woman who allegedly escaped. The man running things on Shutter Island is Dr. John Cawley, played exquisitely by Academy Award winner Ben Kingsley, who seems to be thoroughly disinterested in actually helping Teddy and Chuck piece the clues together.
Due to forces beyond their control (a hurricane-like storm that hits the island), the two detectives are stranded overnight and we begin to learn more about Teddy's back-story and what really brought him to the island.
Before becoming a Marshal, Teddy was a soldier in WWII and was personally there for the liberation of the concentration camp at Dachau. He is plagued by the senseless death and destruction he witnessed in Europe. To compound his own emotional health issues, Teddy is a grieving widower. His wife, he claims, was killed in a fire that ravaged the apartment building the two of them had lived in back in Boston.
We learn Teddy requested the assignment to Shutter Island because he believes two key things: First, that the man who started the fire that killed his wife is imprisoned somewhere on the island. And second, that Nazi-like medical and psychological tests are being conducted on the criminally insane housed there. He wants to both confront the killer of his beloved deceased, and gather evidence against the doctors he believes are torturing the patients.
Twists and turns in the story abound from there.
I don't want to give away much more about the plot of Shutter Island. It's a compelling script with superb acting performances turned in by almost every major and minor character. The music was disturbing and perfectly set the mood for the entire film (another Hitchcock special). The psychological twists and turns absolutely keep you on your toes, and as soon as the credits role you will likely feel compelled to start your own group therapy session in hopes of figuring out what exactly just happened over the previous two hours and seventeen minutes.
Shutter Island is rated R for language and intense scenes of death (mostly from shots of concentration camp victims). Do not take your grandma to this movie.
While not an "instant classic" or "must see", if you like great acting, Hitchcock-like storytelling and maintaining an uneasy feeling in the pit of your stomach for more than two hours, go see Shutter Island (and let me know what you thought of it if you already have).
Oscar’s Big Day
The nominees for the 82nd Oscar's were announced today, and not much changed from the Golden Globe nominations. One nice addition this year is that in the "Best Picture of the Year" category, they actually included movies that people have seen.
1. Best Picture: "Avatar," "The Blind Side," "District 9," "An Education," "The Hurt Locker," "Inglourious Basterds," "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire," "A Serious Man," "Up," "Up in the Air."
Never one to miss an opportunity to put his hair-plugs in his mouth, here's Vice President Joe Biden's take on the Oscar's:
I absolutely loved District 9, and am rooting for Quentin Tarentino's WWII epic Inglourious, but I'm guessing that The Hurt Locker will win.
Why do I guess this? Because the Academy cannot resis making a political statement and this movie (which I've seen and enjoyed) shows soldiers suffering emotional trauma in (and after getting home from) Iraq.
All I know is if Avatar wins the Best Motion Picture of 2009, I will never pay attention to the Oscars again. I get it...the movie looked cool. The script was abysmal and the dialogue beyond cheesy. Plus Ana Lucia from LOST was in it, and I dislike that actress (Michelle Rodriguez) more than I dislike shoveling heavy snow.
Avatar: Imperialistic capitalists ruin everything
Tell me if you’ve heard this one before? A guy walks into a movie theater to see the most expensive movie ever made…
Ok, so I don’t have a witty joke to share here, but I do have some words of advice for you before you see the newly released James Cameron epic Avatar. (For more in-depth reviews, click here.)
First, leave all of your positive feelings about free market capitalism and American exceptionalism at the door.
Forget the fact that the dazzling movie you will be seeing is made with technology made possible by the competitive, productive, liberty-soaked forces of the same free market enterprise that James Cameron will be caricaturing, distorting, and criticizing. Also try and forget that only in a society fueled and funded by free market capitalism can people afford movie tickets north of $10 to watch capitalism disparaged at every animated turn.
The bad guys in Avatar are of course the soul-less, penny-pinching stooges of some intergalactic corporation named RDA. The list of stooges includes mercenary soldiers who, I'm sure purely by coincidence, throughout the movie employ Bush/Cheney-like terminology and strategy. These Blackwater wannabe's work for RDA partly for the paycheck, but mostly for the chance to murder the indigenous population of the planet they’re working on.
That planet is named Pandora, the indigenous people are the Na'vi, and the highly-prized natural resource the evil corporation is on Pandora to drill for (unobtainium) just happens to be right under the Na'vi’s ancestral home.
Second, don’t learn anything about the history of the United States above what you were taught in public school history and English classes before venturing off to the enchanted world of Avatar.
In fact, you’d do well to first go rent and watch both Pocahontas and Fern Gully as refresher courses of all the “facts” you accumulated in K-12th regarding the historical and sociological narratives of Native Americans over the past 400 years. Just remember that all people who have “lived off the land”, worshiped a pantheon of pantheistic gods, and used inferior technology and weaponry than their enemies were not only more interesting than you and your civilization – they were probably better human beings as well.
Third, repeat to yourself (at least 30 times before entering the theater), “Style over substance. Style over substance.” This will be super easy to remember, because it was this type of thinking that gave us our current Commander-in-Chief.
Fourth, in order to prepare for the awkwardness of cliché-ridden dialogue throughout the entire movie, ask your friend who is breaking up with his or her significant other to let you sit in on their “calling it quits” conversation. Building up good wincing muscle endurance would be ideal prior to subjecting yourself to a script that not even Al Gore could get the world to believe was worth saving.
Lastly, and with all of that said, Avatar is a visually stunning film. Some of the battle scenes are unlike almost anything I’ve ever seen. For all of its many plot and thematic faults, by the end of the movie I was entertained and pretty happy I saw it. There is minimal cursing, one brief scene of sensuality, and most of the violence was, in my mind at least, negated by the fact that the people engaging in it are 8’ tall blue dudes (and dudettes).
Warning: I did not get to see Avatar on IMAX, but have heard that it really makes it worth the 2 hours and 40 minutes to invest (at least) $12 for the bigger screen and sound.
Let the rest of us know what you thought of Avatar by clicking “Comments” below and sharing your take on it.
The Road: Dark, Disturbing, Powerful
by: R.J. Moeller
Over the Thanksgiving weekend I went with a few close friends to see The Road, the newly-released thriller from the same writer who brought us No Country For Old Men and starring Viggo Mortensen (Lord of the Rings). Before I give some of my thoughts on the film, here is the trailer:
As Wikipedia recounts:
“The Road follows the premise from the book of the same name. An unnamed father (Mortensen) and his young son (Kodi Smit-McPhee) struggle to survive after an unspecified apocalypse and make their way toward the coast for possible food, shelter, safety, or to potentially find other survivors of the cataclysmic events. Along the way, they encounter grave struggles and hardships across the barren landscapes, with scarce shelter and resources available to them, and having to avoid bands of cannibals and other desperate gangs looking to pillage valuables and food.”
Now that may be the film’s synopsis, but the emotional reality of this story is something vastly different.
The heart of this movie is the relationship between Mortensen, who gives possibly his best acting performance to-date, and his son. His wife, and the boy’s mother, (Charlize Theron) is seen only through flash-backs and we come to learn that she committed suicide a few years before we pick up the tale. He is a broken man after losing his wife, but the contrast between his refusal to lose hope, and the hopelessness that engulfs the planet (and engulfed his wife) is stark and powerful.
The boy, his son, has literally and figuratively become his reason for getting out of bed each morning in this gloomy, depressing, dangerous world he finds himself in. The father continually reminds his son to never “lose the fire” inside of him, and sees in his son’s eyes the potential for mankind’s survival and redemption.
The violence in The Road is frequent, exciting and often disturbing. This isn’t some mindlessly bloody “Slasher” flick, but many of the humans left have in fact become cannibals and the director gives us more than just a passing glimpse of what eating other people would entail. But even here, amidst the harvesting of human organs and char-broiled carcasses, there is something deeper going on. The father and his son are one of the few “good people” who refuse to eat human flesh, and another stark contrast is made between the humanity of these two and the animal-like brutality of those who have succumbed to the disgusting practice. 
This also moves the story forward in an important way because one of the looming dilemmas throughout the film is how and where the two of them will find food that never previously had a Social Security number.
There is only so much I can say without spoiling specific, key plot points, but I desperately want to communicate two important things about The Road. First, this is not a family-friendly movie in any sense of the term. There is no nudity or sensuality, minimal cursing, and no senseless drug use or coarse humor. However, as I’ve stated already, the violent and graphic scenes of human carnage are difficult to watch. The Road is for mature, adult audiences who are interested in a provocative look at what humans can be reduced to when hope has been lost.
The second, and final, thing I will say about this film is that if you do end up seeing it, watch it with more than just your eyes. Listen to it with more than just your ears. Think about the significant themes presented. Contemplate the profound “life questions” that confront you. Ask yourself why it is that this father, someone who has suffered so much, and refuses to acknowledge God (or any Higher Power), still fights to hold on to his humanity? What does the word "humanity" mean to you? Does he sacrifice for his son simply because he needs a “task” to complete to keep him going, or does he (and do you) actually know there must be a point to life, to our existence?
Many will see The Road and dismiss it for not being the mile-a-minute stimulant that something like The Bourne Identity was, or the laugh-a-minute over-indulgent comedy something like The Hangover was, but for those who appreciate Hitchcock-like thrills and Dostoyevsky-like psychology, The Road will not disappoint.
Good Movies Galore
Recently I made a list of 5 movies I consider "must-see's" and posted it here on AVITW. The nice people at a fantastic website called OnlyGoodMovies.com spotted my brief list, linked to it, and turned me on to their own various "must see" lists and movie reviews.
One big highlight from Only Good Movies was their "75 War Movies to See Before You Die" list. Check it out!
Spoiler alert: Their #1 is Patton


