A Voice in the Wilderness In Defense of "Mere Conservatism"

16Apr/10Off

Hey Black Man, Aren’t You Uncomfortable Around Whitey?

I can't wait to get home, download my new podcasts for the day, and hear what Dennis Prager has to say about this story.

The insinuation from this "reporter" is, of course, that black people only really vote for liberal Democrats, so a black man at a Tea Party rally must be there by accident and afraid for his own safety among such racist, homophobic, xenophobic bigots.

I understand why a reporter like Kelly O'Donnell thinks the way she does.  I just don't like it, and firmly believe that her mindset (i.e. all black people not only should be, but are, progressive liberals and supporters of bigger and bigger, unsustainable government) ought to wake some people up to the fact that it is the Left who is obsessed with race.

The Tea Party movement is all about fiscal responsibility, personal and national accountability, limited (Constitutional) government.  It's sad that so many Americans (liberal Democrats and progressives) don't believe in those things; it's even more tragic that they resent those of us who do.


12Apr/10Off

Finishing Sowell’s Thoughts On “Race and Politics”

columnistsSowellLast week I posted Parts I and II of Dr. Thomas Sowell's series on "Race and Politics".  I won't offer much in the way of my commentary here, but I wanted to at the very least link to both Parts III and IV that came out last Thursday and Friday, respectively.

Part III discusses the erroneous notion most have that there is an exclusive link between "causation and morality".

An excerpt:

Today's racial dogmas are no more realistic, when they try to dismiss or downplay behavioral and performance differences among racial and ethnic groups, blaming different outcomes on the misdeeds of others. Nothing is easier to find than sins among human beings. But the fatal misstep is to assume that those sins must be the reason for the differences we see.

The more fundamental question that almost never gets asked is whether there was ever any realistic basis for expecting different racial, ethnic or other groups to all have the same skills and orientations, even if they all had the same genetic potential and there were no injustices.

Those who see differences among groups as being due to environment, rather than heredity, too often think of environment as the current immediate surroundings. But a major part of any group's environment is the culture that they have inherited from the past.

In Part IV, Sowell hammers some convincing nails into the "multiculturalism rules!" coffin:

One of the most ominous developments of our time has been the multicultural dogma that all cultures are equal. It is one of the many unsubstantiated assertions that have become fashionable among self-congratulatory elites, with hard evidence being neither asked for nor offered.

But, however much such assertions minister to the egos of the intelligentsia and the careers of politicians and race hustlers, the multicultural dogma is a huge barrier to the advancement of groups who are lagging economically, educationally and otherwise.

Once you have said that the various economic, educational and other "gaps" and "disparities" of lagging groups are not due to either genes or cultures, what is left but the sins of other people?

Sins are never hard to find, among any group of human beings. But whether that actually helps those who are lagging, or just leads them into the blind alley of resentment, is another question.

We are all blessed to have access to the clarity and wisdom of Tom Sowell.


7Apr/10Off

Sowell’s Back With More Wisdom

Thomas-SowellDr. Sowell wrote a fantastic column on "race" issues in American yesterday, and today he's back with Part II.  This time out Sowell focuses on the misconception far too many Americans have that quotas are not only necessary, but "good."

No dogma has caused more mischief-- and, in some countries, tragedies-- than the notion that there is something strange and wrong when some groups are "over-represented" or "under-represented" in some occupations or institutions.

This dogma is so widely accepted, and so deeply entrenched, that no one asks for evidence and no speck of evidence is offered.

Moreover, tons of evidence to the contrary are ignored.

Despite its humble appearance and influence, my website (and the articles I link to and/or write) matters a great deal to me.  I post things that I think matter.  There are few things more important than healing the racial divisions in this country, and few people who represent my worldview in this area than Dr. Sowell.

The Left has dominated this discussion for 40 years, but conservatives and Republicans, especially religious ones, have been on the side of freedom, liberty, abolition of slavery, and civil rights since our nation's inception.  We've ceded the intellectual and moral ground that is rightly ours to people whose good intentions (via social engineering projects such as welfare and affirmative action) have been disastrous.

Sowell continues:

Not only the media and politicians, but intellectuals and even the highest courts in the land, presume discrimination when some groups are "under-represented" in an employer's workforce or are "over-represented" among children disciplined in school. Tests that show some groups more proficient than others are declared to be "culturally biased." Higher infant mortality among some groups are assumed to be society's fault for not providing "access" to prenatal care for all.

A major factor in the housing boom and bust that created the present economic predicament was massive government intervention in the housing market, supposedly to correct discrimination in mortgage lending. How did they know that there was discrimination? Because blacks were turned down for mortgage loans at a higher rate than whites.

It so happens that whites were turned down for mortgage loans at a higher rate than Asian Americans, but that fact seldom made it into the newspaper headlines or the political rhetoric. Nor did either the mainstream media or political leaders mention the fact that black-owned banks turned down black mortgage loan applicants at least as often as white-owned banks did.

For me to post something from the same author two days in a row ought to signal just how important I truly believe this topic is.  Here's another Sowell video clip to wet your whistle:


6Apr/10Off

Content of Character, or Political Expediency and Petty Jealousy?

tom_4bThomas Sowell is the clearest thinker on the Right today.  A renowned professor of Economics, and now a Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, Sowell writes the pithiest, most insightful columns every week.

In today's piece, Dr. Sowell addresses a topic he has written extensively about: the profoundly negative consequences of perpetually playing the "race card":

Few combinations are more poisonous than race and politics. That combination has torn whole nations apart and led to the slaughters of millions in countries around the world.

You might think we would have learned a lesson from that and stayed away from injecting race into political issues. Yet playing the race card has become an increasingly common response to growing public anger at the policies of the Obama administration and the way those policies have been imposed.

When a few African-American Democrats walked into the Capitol the weekend of the vote, they passed through a crowd of citizens expressing their anger. According to some Democrats, these expressions of anger included racial slurs.

This is a serious charge — and one deserving of some serious evidence. But, despite all the media recording devices on the scene, not to mention recording devices among the crowd gathered there, nobody can come up with a single recorded sound to back up that incendiary charge. Worse yet, some people have claimed that even doubting the charge suggests that you are a racist.

He continues:

Among the people who are likely to be most disappointed with the Obama administration are those who thought it would usher in a post-racial society. That they wished for such a society is a credit to their values. But that they actually expected a move in that direction suggests that they ignored both Barack Obama’s history and the heavily vested interest that too many people have in race hustling.

This is just one of many areas in which this country is likely to pay a very high price for the fact that too many voters paid attention to Obama’s rhetoric while ignoring his actual track record.

However soothing the Obama rhetoric, and however lofty his statements about being a uniter rather than a divider — both racially and in terms of bipartisanship — everything in his past fairly shouts the opposite, but only to those who follow facts.

The tragedy of the Obama administration has been two-fold in my eyes: First, that he and the leaders in Congress seem hell-bent on drastically increasing the size, scope, role, and power of government. This is antithetical to America's founding and historical, legal, and ideological narrative. The second, and potentially equally devastating, is that the man (Obama) who was going to bring races, creeds, political factions, and faiths together has done absolutely nothing to use his bully-pulpit to promote, encourage, or facilitate racial reconciliation. In fact, he's done just the opposite.  He accused the Harvard cop of racism. He and his lackeys accuse the Tea Party movement of racism on a daily basis. He's failed to denounce the ridiculous charges of racism after the health care bill was signed that Sowell (and Andrew Breitbart) have so powerfully addressed in the past three weeks.

Please watch this short clip and hear the stark contrast of Sowell's common sense wisdom to Charlie Rose's lock-step, emoted liberalism.

Charlie Rose...I know you mean well, buddy, but listen to your friend Thomas Sowell.  He's trying to help you out.


9Jan/10Off

Typical Conservative Racism

harry-reid-frownWhat's with these religious, free market conservatives that they're always racist too?  This time it was Harry Reid, the Democrat...wait a minute...a Democrat called President Obama "light-skinned", and someone who spoke with "no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one"?  What gives?

Oh well, honest mistake.  I'm sure the media will let this slip-up go without much fanfare.  You know, the way they do with most Republican slip-ups.  Especially when its a high-ranking Republican in the Senate.

An excerpt from the Associated Press reports:

Reid's comments are included in the book, obtained Saturday by The Associated Press and set to be published on Monday. "Game Change" was written by Time Magazine's Mark Halperin and New York magazine's John Heilemann.

The book also says Reid urged Obama to run, perceiving the first-term senator's impatience.

"You're not going to go anyplace here," Reid told Obama of the Senate. "I know that you don't like it, doing what you're doing."

Oh how boring it must have been to only be a Senator!  Small potatoes.


7Dec/09Off

Harry Reid: Historically Illiterate

harry_reidFresh off the wires today:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took his GOP-blasting rhetoric to a new level Monday, comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago.

Those of you under the impression that our elected leaders in the House and Senate are superior to the average voter/taxpayer in any conceivable way, enjoy this from the leader of the United States Senate (Harry Reid, D-NV):

"Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all the Republicans can come up with is, 'slow down, stop everything, let's start over.' If you think you've heard these same excuses before, you're right," Reid said Monday. "When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said 'slow down, it's too early, things aren't bad enough.'"

He continued: "When women spoke up for the right to speak up, they wanted to vote, some insisted they simply, slow down, there will be a better day to do that, today isn't quite right.

"When this body was on the verge of guaranteeing equal civil rights to everyone regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today."

So in the mind of the 4th most powerful man in the country, Government-run Health Care =Freedom (the kind slaves were only granted when a Republican president ignored Democrats and fought an unpopular, horrifically violent Civil War)?  Do you feel safer knowing this guy is making decisions about the fate of your nation?

Historically speaking, what Senator Reid said was something more than "false."  This is a new kind of wrong.

The Republican Party, for all of its many faults, was created in 1854 with one of its core tenets being the abolition of slavery.

Oh, and remember Civil Rights? It was the Republicans who helped Lyndon Baines Johnson pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964 and the "Southern Bloc" of southern Senators led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage. Said Russell: "We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states.

But what's factual representation of history compared to forcing a public option through Congress, right?  Plus, it's not like Harry Reid will have to be worried about getting lambasted in the major newspapers in this country tomorrow.

There's no political fall-out from ridiculous spectacles such as the one he made today because the media will have plenty of "Sarah Palin sounds funny" and "Dick Cheney is an old, mean guy" write-ups to fill in the places in their publications that could be dedicated to actual reporting and intellectually honest commentary.

One last thing: please remember that in Bush's second term, the Democrats fought tooth-and-nail for judicial nominations to the federal court.  Now they are mad and shocked that the GOP would stand its ground over the government take-over of 1/6 of the U.S. economy.  Makes sense.


20Oct/09Off

Obama’s Justice Department Condescending to Black Voters

Hopefully that headline grabbed your attention.  Sadly, it is true and no gimmick.  The Department of Justice has ruled that a town in North Carolina is not allowed to remove party affiliations from all local ballots.

The Justice Department has overruled a small North Carolina city's attempt to end the use of party affiliation in local elections, according to a report in The Washington Times.

According to the article, the Justice Department ruled that party affiliations are needed in part to protect equal rights for black voters. The department determined that white voters in Kinston, N.C., would only cast their ballots for black candidates if they run as Democrats.

So who cares?  What's the big deal?  I'm sure Bush did stuff like this anyway, right?

This town in North Carolina voted to do away with party affiliations so that candidates would have to run on merit, ideas, and their own track-record.  Novel idea, no?  But that isn't good enough in Obama's America.  Race MUST be involved in everything.  The town in question is 2/3's black, which means that for this law to have passed in the first place, the same black people who allegedly wouldn't know who to vote for if there isn't a "D" in front of the candidate's name knew enough about what they want from their government to endorse this idea.

Also important to this story is the fact that the Obama Justice Department that spent its time worrying over this local issue in rural NC has been exposed as being racially selective in the issues it tackles.

The decision was made by the same department official who dismissed a case against New Black Panther Party members in Philadelphia.

So black militants who intimidate voters in Philly from casting their ballot for anyone but Barack Obama is a non-story, not worthy of the Department of Justice's time...yet a town of black voters deciding they do no want political affiliations to be placed on local ballots requires immediate attention and action.

Follow that logic.


16Oct/09Off

Rush Limbaugh is NOT a Racist

rush_limbaugh-1He really isn't.  You might hate his views, find his personality objectionable, or never listen to his radio show, but the man is not a racist.  Rush has been booted from the investment group that was bidding to buy the St. Louis Rams, but only because he is a hated conservative commentator who happens to be succcessful and uncompromising.  He's not perfect.  He doesn't speak for all conservatives or Republicans.  But he has EVERY right to try and own a team or donut shop or Handy Andy.

Here's Rush, in his own words, explaining what has really been going on the last few weeks since this story broke:

As I explained on my radio show, this spectacle is bigger than I am on several levels. There is a contempt in the news business, including the sportswriter community, for conservatives that reflects the blind hatred espoused by Messrs. Sharpton and Jackson. "Racism" is too often their sledgehammer. And it is being used to try to keep citizens who don't share the left's agenda from participating in the full array of opportunities this nation otherwise affords each of us. It was on display many years ago in an effort to smear Clarence Thomas with racist stereotypes and keep him off the Supreme Court. More recently, it was employed against patriotic citizens who attended town-hall meetings and tea-party protests.

These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.

Read the rest of his Wall Street Journal Op-Ed here.

Don't believe the press was out of line in their coverage of Rush's bid to buy a company (even one that happens to be an NFL team)?  Watch this:


16Oct/09Off

Doug Giles: Christian Media Failed on ACORN Story

The controversy surrounding the community organizing group ACORN has been been swirling for some time now.  Even the casual observer was forced to take note of the painfully obvious lack of initial coverage on the part of the mainstream media.  The Daily Show's John Stewart, to his eternal credit, was willing to mock the media for their hand-sitting:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
The Audacity of Hos
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Ron Paul Interview

There is much more to the ACORN story than the media's timidity and disinterest. Last week I posted some information about a group, Americans for Prosperity, who are doing tremendous work in pursuing ACORN's corruption on local and state levels.

Today I came across a provocative piece from the father of the girl who posed as a hoooker in those now infamous ACORN tapes. His name is Doug Giles, he writes a syndicated column for Townhall.com, and is a pastor in Florida. His blog-post today on BigGovernment.com (the best site you likely aren't reading...yet) goes after the lack of coverage on the ACORN scandals on the part of the "Christian media."

Why the silence of the lambs, Jesus people?  I would have thought you guys would be all over this stuff like stink on a monkey. But alas, the holy ones are wholly silent.

So, why should there be interest and serious reporting of this mega-tale by the broadcast brethren?  Well, I’m glad you boys finally asked, seeing that we’re now about six weeks out.

Here’s a reason why: Two Christian kids, instead of sitting on their butts in church singing Kum Ba Yah and pulling lint out of their navels in some vapid youth group, saw a multi-million dollar Goliath of crime and corruption fueled by our tax dollars and rose to the occasion, creatively infiltrating an insidious environment and bringing a despicable organization to its knees.  That’s why.  Giles and O’Keefe went biblical. Note that.

Hey, Icthus crowd . . . is that not good enough for you to broadcast? It happened yesterday and was—and still is—huge. I would think you would jump on it because I’ve watched your Christian shows, listened to your radio programs and surfed some of your hallelujah websites, and they could use a Red Bull because they’re bo-ring. Geez people, South Park is even on this!

You’ve ignored this colossal story as you stand on the sidelines of the culture war, watching history being made by two gutsy believers as you ogle some spike-haired Dove award winner or some cheesy, horse-toothed minister who puts the “ky” in icky. You ladies and gents must have some kind of crazy job security.

For the religious among you, I'd love for you to read the rest of his piece and let me know your thoughts on Mr. Giles' take.


21Sep/09Off

Thomas Sowell and the “underdog”

Combining two of my favorite things, Thomas Sowell's commentary and baseball, this latest column from Dr. Sowell is nothing short of brilliant.  In it he contemplates the nature of "underdogs", and America's fascination with them.

An excerpt:

Nobody told me that I couldn't make it because I was poor and black, or that I ought to hate white people today because of what some other white people did to my ancestors in some other time.

Nobody sugar-coated the facts of racial discrimination. But Professor Sterling Brown of Howard University, who wrote with eloquent bitterness about racism, nevertheless said to me when I prepared to transfer to Harvard: "Don't come back here and tell me you didn't make it 'cause white folks were mean."

He burned my bridges behind me, the way they used to do with armies going into battle, so that they had no place to retreat to, and so had to fight to win.

Here's more from Sowell on race, affirmative action, and diversity:


RJ's Social Network

Read RJ’s Columns/Blogs

What is “Mere Conservatism”?

The basic ideas, ideals, and values that generally define and characterize the central tenets of what today might be termed "modern conservative thought."

We believe that a proper understanding of history, economics, and theology leads to certain conclusions. Many of these are the same conclusions our Founding Fathers arrived at in constructing a "more perfect union."

All ideas and opinions are welcome; not all are correct.

Mere Conservatism Links:
 Econ Part I  |  Econ Part II
Intro  |  Theology  |  History

Video of RJ

RJ Speaking at Acton 2010

Rudy the Dog barks at "change"

Books You Need to Read

Wall Street Journal

Blogroll

Columnists You Need to Read

Music/Entertainment

News/Politics

Thinktanks

Archives

Categories

Historical Blogs

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Meta

wordpress blog stats